Talk:Delayed gratification/GA2

(Redirected from Talk:Deferred gratification/GA2)
Latest comment: 11 years ago by CabbageX in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CabbageX (talk · contribs) 21:08, 6 December 2012 (UTC) Initiated review on 7/12/2012. CabbageX (talk) 21:08, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    The lead section represents a good overview of the article. The language is objective, and hedges where necessary.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    The references used in this article represent a comprehensive overview of the topic, and are mostly from peer-reviewed publications. However, the Psychoanalytic drives and impulses requires references to support the statements.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    This article appears to provide a broad view of the topic, with necessary amount of detail.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    The tone is neutral, and in some sections, both sides of an argument are represented fairly.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    The second image does not have a copyright tag.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    The previous reviewer failed the nomination for lack of a lead section, issues with references, and problems with the writing. This submission has mostly fixed those problems. The submission is on hold, pending a second opinion from the original reviewer, and an improvement for the two issues mentioned above.

CabbageX (talk) 00:37, 7 December 2012 (UTC)Reply