Talk:Deekay Knight
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Specifications
editCouple of comments/queries after comparing these figures with JAWA 1938. Most agree, but Jane's gives the length as 22' 10" not 27' 10". I measured up the g/a diagram in Jane's and its ratio of span to length (1.38) is in agreement with the shorter length.
Also Jane's says the performance figures, with the same values as the article, are estimated. They may have been confirmed, but were they? Jane's also gives SC and rate of climb, again estimated.TSRL (talk) 08:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well spotted I didnt notice the two sources I had disagreed. The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Aircraft has 27ft 10in and Jackson's British Civil Aircraft has 22ft 10in. So with your JAWA ref above thats 2 v 1 so I have changed it to 22ft 10in and referenced Jackson. Thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 18:57, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Deekay Knight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606161116/http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/HistoricalMaterial/G-AFBA.pdf to http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/HistoricalMaterial/G-AFBA.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)