Talk:Crescent honeyeater/GA1
(Redirected from Talk:Crescent Honeyeater/GA1)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Casliber in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 21:20, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Some thoughts:
- It'd be good if we could have a lead image of a male and one of a female. (Also, why "male" and not "Male" in the caption?)
- "honeyeater family Meliphagidae" honeyeater and Meliphagidae link to the same article
- De-linked honeyeater
- "Two subspecies are recognised." Perhaps go into this? In fact, considering the length of the article, a lead of only one paragraph seems a little too short
- tea-tree is a dablink
- "Banding studies" Is there an appropriate link for this?
- Linked to Bird ringing Marj (talk) 05:06, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Paras 2 and 3 of "Breeding" both discuss fledglings. Best to consolidate?
- Correa is a dablink
- You abbreviate Mt. Lofty in the second mention, but spell it out in full the first and third times
- "Acacia dealbata" Why do you not link? Don't be scared of redlinks! Also, is "Bondi State Forest" worth linking?
- The feeding section feels like it isn't structured that well. Sorry I can't be more specific, but I'd reccomend trying to restructure, especially if you have FAC in mind.
- It feels like you never properly discuss predation of the species- it's mentioned in passing in the lead and the breeding section, but surely there's a little more to be said?
- The reference formatting seems odd in a few places:
- "^ BirdLife International (2004). Phylidonyris pyrrhopterus. In: IUCN 2007. (2007) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 10 June 2008" This isn't a very standard format
- Page numbers seem to be used oddly in refs 3, 4 and 5
- Sometimes "Victoria" is abbreviated to "Vic", sometimes not (also, sometimes you cite cities, sometimes nations)
- "Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds" Italicise? Also, "Birds" as opposed to "birds"?
- Some more wikilinks to publishers, authors etc wouldn't hurt
- Most references to journals don't bother with a publisher- "^ Cooper, Roy P. (1960). "The Crescent Honeyeater". Australian Bird Watcher (Melbourne, Vic: Bird Observers Club) 1: 70–76. ISSN 00450316." does
- Two columns for the references would probably look a little nicer.
- Category:Animals described in 1802? Category:Birds of New South Wales? Category:Birds of Victoria (Australia)?
- A link to the base image on File:Crescenthoneyeaterrangemap.png would be good.
Generally looking very nice- most of what I've said is very minor. Clearly well researched and well written. Sources are reliable, images are free. I made a few small fixes. J Milburn (talk) 22:00, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Let me know when you feel you're done with my comments, but don't feel rushed. J Milburn (talk) 16:00, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- I've done all I can, I'll leave it to Cas to sign off Marj (talk) 00:31, 24 November 2011 (UTC)