Talk:Fortaleza da São Tomé

(Redirected from Talk:Cranganore Fort)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by AnomieBOT in topic Orphaned references in Fortaleza da São Tomé

Information needs to be verified

edit

Information needs to be verified The information contained in this article needs to be verified. A search for references turned up this link [1] which states that "Kottappuram Fort, built by the Portuguese in 1523 was referred to popularly as Cranganore Fort and is now known as Kodungalloor Fort." Unimaize (talk) 18:10, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Fortaleza da São Tomé

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Fortaleza da São Tomé's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "EB1911":

  • From Dhar:   One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Dhar". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 8 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 142.
  • From Kodungallur: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Kodungalur" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 15 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 885.
  • From Bijapur Fort: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Bijapur" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 3 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 928.
  • From Kalinjar Fort:   One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Kalinjar". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 15 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 642.
  • From Daulatabad Fort:   One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Daulatabad". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 7 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 848–849.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 17:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply