Talk:Constantine III (Western Roman emperor)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 16:03, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

I'll start this in a day or two.

Gog the Mild,please check my edits/tweaks. Also you're missing some bib / source ntoes.

@Auntieruth55:

• Apologies, references added by another editor subsequent to nomination. Now added to Sources.
• Your changes look good. I have tweaked a couple of them here. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: