Talk:Condé Nast (businessman)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Grave photos
editI don't know this seems tasteless to me, how many encyclopedias in world history had pictures of remarkable people's unremarkable graves? I say flush. 206.205.54.73 (talk) 05:15, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Requested move 28 October 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Condé Nast (businessman) as per below discussion. (non-admin closure) Iffy★Chat -- 11:53, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Condé Montrose Nast → Condé Nast (publisher) – per WP:COMMONNAME, with Wikipedia:NATURALDIS not applicable in this instance. Subject was not known to the public by his middle name and never used it — even his own gravestone makes no mention of it — the name is inscribed as simply "CONDÉ NAST". The mass media company that he founded is usually referenced as Condé Nast and is listed at Bloomberg L.P. as Condé Nast Inc. which, as can be seen, is currently a redlink. Since there may not be consensus for the publisher's main title header to be Condé Nast and the mass media company to be Condé Nast Inc., the above proposal seems to be the most acceptable one. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:53, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose "publisher" can refer to a company. Condé Nast (publisher) is ambiguous as it can refer to Condé Nast the company. I suggest Condé Nast (businessman) instead. feminist (talk) 15:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- I would support Condé Nast (businessman), Condé Nast (entrepreneur) or any alternative qualifier that can obtain consensus. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 20:15, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Support Condé Nast (businessman) as above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:51, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.