Talk:Clan Blackadder

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

The W. Anderson passage

edit

I think maybe the Anderson bit should be removed. I'm not sure it is taken seriously. His bit about Robert Blackadder the prior doesn't fit at all with the well made wiki-article we've got on him. Perhaps it is more harmful leaving it in the article than removing it.--Celtus (talk) 06:16, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's a different Robert Blackadder, as the archbishop had died in 1508. I've unlinked him. The passage should stay, as it is typical of border reiver culture at that time.86.46.221.236 (talk) 12:08, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Clan Blackadder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:36, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply