Talk:Chicago station (CTA Red Line)
(Redirected from Talk:Chicago (CTA Red Line station))
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Gfoley4 in topic Move?
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move?
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved —GFOLEY FOUR— 01:29, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Chicago (CTA Red Line station) → Chicago/State (CTA station) – Announcer on the train saids Chicago/State User:69.209.193.217 20:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Grand (CTA Red Line station) → Grand/State (CTA station)
- Chicago (CTA Brown and Purple Lines station) → Chicago/Franklin (CTA station)
- Division (CTA station) → Division/Milwaukee (CTA station)
- Chicago (CTA Blue Line station) → Chicago/Milwaukee (CTA station)
- Grand (CTA Blue Line station) → Grand/Milwaukee (CTA station)
- The other 5 moves were asked for in Wikipedia:Requested moves#Current requests with the same message except for the name/name part. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- These pages should be move because they are better titles. 69.209.193.217 (talk) 06:03, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Standard dabbing conventions use the common name dabbed by the train line, I believe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs)
- Oppose. My understanding is that the current titles are correct according to the relevant naming convention. If you want to change the convention then please start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikiproject trains. Thryduulf (talk) 23:06, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. The CTA has started using Chicago and State in their on-board announcements. But the station signs and CTA website still use just Chicago. Also distinguishing the three Chicago Avenue 'L' stations by their line colour is, in my opinion, more useful to the reader and more in line with most commonly used naming of these stations. The suggested names should probably all be made into redirects to the current names though.—Jeremy (talk) 23:56, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.