Talk:Chengdu Shuangliu International Airport
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chengdu Shuangliu International Airport article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Lead
editPlease consider moving all the alternate information in the lead (different languages and scripts etc) and put them in the infobox instead.--Filll 17:30, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Discrepancy - Fifth or Sixth Busiest Airport in China
editThis article says the airport is the fifth busiest in China; the article on Chengdu says it is the sixth busiest. Can anyone resolve the discrepancy? papageno (talk) 03:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- This article describes the airport as the fifth busiest. Chengdu says it's the sixth 'largest'. I believe busiest is defined in passengers per year (arrivals/departures/transfers), while largest may be defined by area. I do agree there are discrepancies in the articles discussing this airport, though. For example, right now both Chengdu_Shuangliu_International_Airport and Shanghai_Hongqiao_International_Airport claim to be the "5th busiest airport in China", but I imagine this is because of using different years for the given statistics. Varuka (talk) 16:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- This page should be the main source of information about the airport. Both claims of bigness were unreferenced, so a cleaned things up by removing a lot of information from the Chendu article, and making it say what this page says. When references are available and this article gets updated, we can then copy the information to the Chengdu article. I'm not sure what is factually correct, but the current edits make things consistent and much cleaner. —fudoreaper (talk) 23:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
China Eastern flights to Los Angeles
editShould Los Angeles be moved to Terminal 2? Flights to/from Los Angeles include a stopover in Nanjing. 71.198.231.208 (talk) 00:15, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, "Los Angeles" is a domestic flight. HkCaGu (talk) 02:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Changed. HkCaGu (talk) 02:55, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- An IP continues to move it back to Terminal 1, left a message at his/her talk page. Also, made both hidden and foot note for this. Passengers traveling from CTU to LAX go through immigration procedure in Nanjing not Chengdu. So, yes "LAX" should be listed under Terminal 2 destinations not Terminal 1. 97.85.118.142 (talk) 03:43, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Changed. HkCaGu (talk) 02:55, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chengdu Shuangliu International Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303213055/http://sichuan.scol.com.cn/cddt/20090318/200931870949.htm to http://sichuan.scol.com.cn/cddt/20090318/200931870949.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:34, 13 July 2021 (UTC)