Talk:Setellia femoralis

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cephalia femoralis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090312100559/http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt to http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150327011528/http://data.gbif.org/species/browse/taxon/13143053 to http://data.gbif.org/species/browse/taxon/13143053

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion

I have searched extensively both online and other documents, I can not find no record of this species being described. Simuliid talk 05:48, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Then use the appropriate deletion procedure. Speedy deletion via WP:A7 is obviously inappropriate. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:48, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Unhelpful! What is the appropriate deletion procedure? It may be obvious to you, but not to me. I did spend a good deal of time reading the deletion process before rasing this, and it seemed the most obvious having read themSimuliid talk 09:06, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

The deletion procedure is described at WP:AFD. Most people use WP:TWINKLE to nominate articles for deletion, but I don't use it myself so can't advise you about its workings. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:11, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. I did use TWINKLE, it only offers me Speedy deletion. In researching deletion, to paraphrase somewhat, it was to use a long-winded process, editing pages a mere mortal can't understand or "just use twinkle"

WP:AFD is helpful, thanks. However, I read many other pages that also cover deletion.

I have been on here a long time and done a good many edits. I like to think I know some areas very well, and other not at all - deletion being one of them. I did strongly suspect that I would be pulled up on something here, as it was the first deletion request. But was hoping for helpful guidance. Which you have now given me.

Like all editors. I make mistakes and I get picked up on them. But I do get angry if it in the form off a telling off, with no help. I see some editors will delete an entire edit, done in good faith, when they could have just corrected the typo, misspelling, or politely as the editor to add a reference etc. I correct other editors, but I like to assume good faith and be helpful.Simuliid talk 09:53, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

You forfeited the assumption of good faith by edit-warring rather than talking. I am willing to be helpful to anyone, but only after they have stopped edit-warring. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)