Talk:L Catterton

Requested move 07 October 2014

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 05:55, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

---

L Catterton → Catterton – The Company recently celebrated its 25th anniversary on October 1st, 2014 and on this date unveiled its re-branding effort, which included a name change from "Catterton Partners" to simply "Catterton." The website, which was also unveiled on this date, can be found here and supports this fact, showing that the Company is only referred to as "Catterton." http://www.catterton.com/AboutUs.html. Jennwzhu89 (talk) 18:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Weak support at this point people often quote recentism but I can't see why not to make the change. Gregkaye ✍♪ 18:58, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
• Given that there is already an article at Catterton, perhaps it would be better to include a disambiguation in the title.--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:12, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
• Move to Catterton (company). Not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the word "Catterton" either by usage in reliable sources or long-term significance. 61.10.165.33 (talk) 00:38, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
• Strong oppose Catterton is an article about a different subject. If you wish to delete the parish's article, use WP:AFD. Otherwise, we do not overwrite articles on different subjects using MoveRequests. -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 03:59, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose. The recent change of official name is almost irrelevant according to the policy on which arguments here are supposed to be based. Leave it as is for now. Andrewa (talk) 05:55, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Catterton Partners. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130922044235/http://www.cpequity.com:80/news/catterton-partners-closes-two-funds.html to http://www.cpequity.com/news/catterton-partners-closes-two-funds.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)