Talk:Duilio-class ironclad
(Redirected from Talk:Caio Duilio-class ironclad)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Tomandjerry211 (alt) in topic GA Review
 | Duilio-class ironclad has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 16, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Caio Duilio-class ironclad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 23:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
The article looks pretty good, with only a few minor issues:
- Citations are unecessary in the lead if the material is cited in the body.
- The specific line is not cited in the body.
- Hyphenate ISBNs.
- Not necessary - someone who knows a lot more about this than I do pointed out that ISBN formatting is not standard, and since I don't know the specific formatting for each ISBN, I don't bother adding hyphens. For what it's worth, worldcat doesn't use hyphens either.
- Shouldn't the first cite be a note?
- Not really worth splitting it off into its own section.
- Link "guard ship"
- Already linked, both in the lead and the body.
--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing the article. Parsecboy (talk) 12:07, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Passing, Well done.!--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 20:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)