Talk:1971 Baseball Hall of Fame balloting
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
same old system
editThe 1971 elections to select inductees to the Baseball Hall of Fame followed the same system in use since 1968.
They appointed a committee on the Negro Leagues and inducted Satchel Paige! --P64 (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- For the New York Times coverage, begin with the 1971-02-10 stories by Joe Durso and Arthur Daley, featuring the appointment of a committee on Negro Leagues and yesterday's election of Paige. The episode continued regarding how Paige (and others, later) would be honored and it ended with his August induction into the Hall of Fame itself rather than any special exhibit at the National Baseball Museum and HOF. --P64 (talk) 01:20, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Baseball Hall of Fame balloting, 1971. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120614052736/http://baseballhall.org/hall-famers/bbwaa-voting/year?year=1971 to http://baseballhall.org/hall-famers/bbwaa-voting/year?year=1971
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:26, 27 October 2016 (UTC)