Talk:Balsamia oregonensis

Enough resources?

@Voorts: I saw that you added the more-citations tag, completely understand why, just wondering when you think it should be removed, the citations have gone from 2 sources to 8, I aim to add one more soon but cannot find a reliable source so I continue to search. I know I should be "bold" but I have little experiance with removing tags and just want to get this article out of stub and into 'start-class' so I feel good about moving on. Hoping you might swing by and estimate based on the limited academic literature on the topic how many sources is enough. Edit: I have checked the list of start-class articles for fungi and I think this should qualify soon if someone else comes and makes sizeable changes, it has eclipsed some articles in that class (one such article I checked being Barley stripe rust) best wishes to anyone who sees this Normalman101 (talk) 18:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

The most important problem with this article is that the relevant taxonomic databases, such as Index Fungorum, Mycobank and GBIF all give the currently accepted name of this species as Balsamia oregonensis. The same problem applies to other articles you have recently created. I already moved Barssia maroccana. William Avery (talk) 06:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)