Talk:Balwyn

(Redirected from Talk:Balwyn, Victoria)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by The Night Watch in topic Requested move 17 January 2023

Conflicting suburb boxes

edit

The suburb boxes of Surrey Hills and Balwyn conflict with eachother. Which one is correct? Somebody in the WWW 08:42, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

They're both correct. Balwyn is to the north of both Canterbury and Surrey Hills. Most of the new suburb boxes don't allow more than one suburb per cell though, which is in my opinion, a major problem with them - this is why. TPK 10:58, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
What about MelbSuburbBox2? Somebody in the WWW 23:07, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)

why i added the tags why i added the tags first i think someone can expand this article with more good information and you needs to source you information as well thanksOo7565 18:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Deepdene now separate suburb

edit

Deepdene is now officially a suburb - it will require a page for itself and obviously changes to any sections of the Balwyn page that refer to it. Mustard Pot (talk) 06:19, 21 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 17 January 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) The Night Watch (talk) 14:42, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply


– These are all unnecessary disambiguation (thus going against WP:CONCISE) as they are completely ambiguous. Given the outcome of a recent discussion I would have boldly moved these but was prevented from doing so by the history at the base titles, all of which have been redirects without issue for decades. A7V2 (talk) 04:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.