This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present.
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
Scroll to the bottom, click on author, SAlEX Korsan explains that he is a professional hacker. Material has been copied including WP's reference numbering without bothering to include the references themselves. Always a giveaway that this is a backwards copy violation.
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
this material was written for the college by someone offering tutoring
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
Parts of "Neronian persecution" are misrepresenting the actual quoted sourcesedit
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Brent D. Shaw, The Myth of the Neronian Persecution, is cited when calling the setion in Annals authentic, when in reality he wrote "There is no objective contemporary evidence that would definitely indicate an attack on Christians by Nero, either in connection with the Great Fire or otherwise.". Richard Carrier is cited to lead the reader to believe that he also affirms the authenticity, when actually Carrier says " It is here argued that their arguments can be met with no strong rebuttal, and therefore the key sentence in Tacitus referring to Christ should be considered suspect."
This is extremly suspect and poor standard for wikipedia.Atanar (talk) 18:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Atanar Where is that? The only reference to him that I see is under Neronian persecution saying: Brent D. Shaw has argued against the historicity of the Tacitean account of the Neronian persecution of Christians. Jenhawk777 (talk) 05:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Jenhawk777: I have corrected the error and eliminated references to Carrier (he is WP:FRINGE). Brent Shaw does not argue against the authenticity of the text, but states that Tacitus is historically unreliable. This argument has not won acceptance among scholars, AFAIK.--Karma1998 (talk) 21:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
So where are we now with this article. Is it in good shape? Are there unresolved issues? Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:11, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
In the section Persecution from AD 49 to 250, there are references to Ed RICHARDSON: "Ed Richardson explains..." The book cited lists 2 editors, Karl P. Donfried & Peter Richardson. SedesGobhani (talk) 15:04, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
