Talk:Ann Arbor, Michigan
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ann Arbor, Michigan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
Ann Arbor, Michigan is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 5, 2008. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Population
editAre the population figures quoted inclusive or exclusive of the student/faculty populations of the university? With order of 30,000 staff and 40,000 students, those two figures would diverge quite sharply depending on the composition. Bluedudemi (talk) 13:15, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Channel outage.
editTwice in two days same approximate time channel goes out. No weather problems. Is your people who can't do their jobs? 2601:406:4D02:2C60:C156:8577:1EF5:C2C9 (talk) 02:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hey, while I understand that the electricity problem in AA is upsetting (and needs to be fixed!), Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and isn't the place for that discussion. ——267 07:29, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
"Ace Deuce" listed at Redirects for discussion
editThe redirect Ace Deuce has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Ace Deuce until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:URFA/2020 and WP:FA concerns
editI am reviewing this article as part of WP:URFA/2020, an initiative to improve English Wikipedia's older featured articles. I have some concerns with this article, which I am outlining below:
- Information has been added to the article since it's FAR that is too detailed for an article of this scope. This includes much of the information about various issues in the "Politics" section, much of the Sports section, the 2010 census data and information in the "Economy" section.
- The "Infrastructure" suffers from MOS:OVERSECTION.
- There are several uncited passages throughout the article.
Is anyone interested in fixing up this article on this article? Z1720 (talk) 03:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)