Talk:Andrew Ross (rugby union, born 1879)/GA1

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wugapodes (talk · contribs) 14:44, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Reply


Will review. Wugapodes [thɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 14:44, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Checklist

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    See WP:PEACOCK
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    See WP:PEACOCK
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Comments

edit

If the comment is numbered, it must be addressed for the article to pass, if it is bulleted, it's an optional suggestion or comment that you don't need to act on right now.
When I quote things, you can use ctrl+f to search the page for the specific line I quoted.

  1. "He had an adventurous life..." too editorialized. Reword to be more neutral and encyclopedic
    Done. FunkyCanute (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
  2. The block quote on his death reads as rather non-neutral since it contains almost entirely praise which doesn't add much information.
    Removed. FunkyCanute (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • You might want to wikilink "solicitor" in the lead. I don't know what it is, and solicitor is a dab page.
  • The Action at St Eloi Craters section seems to be almost entirely quotes. I would recommend rewriting it to use original prose. See WP:OVERQUOTE.
  • After removing the quote from the CO, the balance, I think, is restored.

Results

edit

On Hold for 7 days. Very close! Just a few more edits. Wugapodes [thɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 19:55, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

I think that's everything cleared up. Many thanks for the review, Wugapodes. FunkyCanute (talk) 09:57, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Promoted Very good work! Wugapodes [thɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 01:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Reply