Talk:Admiral-class battlecruiser/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 11:20, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   There's something wrong with the reference to the Mackensens; do you mean the Ersatz Yorcks? The Mackensens had 35cm guns, not 38s.

   That's what Brit Intelligence was reporting at the time; I've clarified it through a note.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:58, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

   Looks good, but you might also want to mention that Germany was in fact building four Mackensens, not three. Parsecboy (talk) 11:26, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   One other thing: the external link doesn't seem to be working. Other than that everything looks pretty good. Just fix the bit about the Mackensens/Ersatz Yorcks and this article will be ready for GA. Parsecboy (talk) 11:36, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

   Fixed the link.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:58, 30 May 2010 (UTC)