Talk:AFI's 100 Years...100 Laughs

(Redirected from Talk:AFI's 100 Years... 100 Laughs)
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Keithw84 in topic Veracity of the list

Permissions

edit

For copyright clarification for this list, please see OTRS ticket 2007041310002766. Mak (talk) 01:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Elaboration of the above: Wikipedia does have permission to post this entire list, so don't go and delete it over copyright worries. Where are THE BLUES BROTHERS? What a terrible omission! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Foxjce (talkcontribs) 16:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Big Lebowski isn't in it, so it was made by idiots anyway.

edit

I won't bother to put this up for well-deserved deletion, but may I ask whoever created this beauty of a list here for the encyclopedic merit of the list as such? Is the list itself notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia page of its own? —AldeBaer 05:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Grandma's Boy?

edit

If this list is from 2000, how is sub-par film "Grandma's Boy" (2007) on the list? I suspect tom-foolery. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.107.4.107 (talk) 00:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

"DO NOT DELETE THIS LIST AS A COPYVIO. THIS LIST IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. For copyright clarification for this list, please see OTRS ticket 2007041310002766"

I checked it. It does not come form AFI but from some random yahoo mail user who claims it comes from AFI, which may or may not be true. W e have no confirmation from AFI. I will ask them to send it direct. Guy (Help!) 17:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Shortening name for compacting left column

edit

I would suggest shortening "Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb" to its equally identifiable "Dr. Strangelove" as it is pushing the entire list 4 or so tabs to the right for every other movie, making it unnecessarily difficult to quickly read the year the films were produced.

Veracity of the list

edit

I know that Some Like It Hot was ranked #1 on this list, so the article has clearly been tampered with. Not sure what else is incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keithw84 (talkcontribs) 01:55, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply