Talk:2 cm Flak 30, Flak 38 and Flakvierling 38

(Redirected from Talk:2 cm FlaK 30)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Place of Origin

edit

The place of origin is specified with "Nazi Germany". This is just a slang term. The proper name should be Third Reich.--92.78.72.149 (talk) 13:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Technically, the use of "Third Reich" is also not correct, although it is superior to "Nazi Germany". However, at the time of the introduction of the FlaK-30, the use of "Third Reich" was not in use. What's wrong with "Germany"? Ranya (talk) 05:42, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

cartridge information incorrect

edit

The article says the gun uses the Rheinmetall MK20 Rh202 "shell". This is incorrect for three reasons: (1) Rheinmetall MK20 Rh202 is a gun not a type of ammunition, (2) the cartridge used by the Rheinmetall MK20 Rh202 (20x139) is different from that used by the FlaK 30 (20x138B), (3) it's not a "shell" its a "cartridge".

Similarly "calibre" is 20 mm not "20 x 139 mm" as the article says, which is wrong for two reasons.

So I'm editting the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cabalamat (talkcontribs) 06:13, 21 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

2 cm Flakvierling 38 independent page

edit

I suggest that the 2 cm Flakvierling 38 section could be in separate page, because it will be more user-friendly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibericus Lusitanus (talkcontribs) 22:29, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

2 cm Flakvierling 38 width and height are same as 2 cm Flak 30 - unlikely. Looks like cut and paste of same info —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79amuel (talkcontribs) 08:49, 11 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

U.S. specifications

edit

U.S. data is at http://www.lonesentry.com/ordnance/tag/flak-38 - does not agree with all the values given here. U.S. war data may be wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottadamthompson (talkcontribs) 00:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Skink anti-aircraft tank

edit

The Canadian army introduced the Skink anti-aircraft tank, a converted Grizzly I cruiser tank with quad mount 20 mm Polsten cannon. By 1945, the lack of threat from the Luftwaffe halted production after only seven tanks were converted and only three saw action. Reportedly they were mostly used to flush out snipers or MGs.184.66.110.161 (talk) 23:38, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Opening Paragraph use of Flugabwehrkanone

edit

I have never seen the term "" employed in any original written German source, nor in any reliable translation. I have seen it used in some online sources, inconsistently (niehorster).

Therefore, I believe this needs changing to the term used by the HeersFlaKArtillerie, "FliegerabwehrKanone (FlaK)".

Although there is a German construction using flugzeug for aeroplane, I am not familiar with "FlugabwehrKanone" (which would literally mean "fly antiaircraft cannon"). The Luftwaffe used "Bordkannone" for heavy automatic cannon mounted aboard its Zerstörer for anti-bomber missions (the BK.37, BK.50, and BK.75, for example).

If the term is believed accurate, please provide an original source in German for verification.

Thanks! Ranya (talk) 05:37, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2 cm Flak 30/38/Flakvierling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:36, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply