Nicoljaus reverted my removal of mention of anti-air batteries in Crimea as irrelevant to the Kerch Strait event. Rather than reverting the reversion, I am asking for a broader judgement of relevance. It would be extremely easy and even further irrelevant to add any number of other Ukrainian and Russian actions to this article but I think there are logical limits.Moryak (talk) 23:32, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
- On the one hand, sources note that deployment of AA batteries happened after the incident or even link it to. On the other, however, plans for such deployment were reported well before this incident. So, I have some doubts that this can be considered a response to the incident. After all, denunciation of the Russo-Ukrainian Friendship treaty and Ukraine's plans to introduce resolution on Azov Sea into UNGA aren't reactions to the Kerch Strait incident as well - since both were considered and (in case of the Friendship treaty) initiated before this incident. Same goes for batteries then. --Seryo93 (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
- Complex issue. I canceled the deletion because I had seen at the ref - two events were correlated there. If the deployment was done according to the previous plans - perhaps this is really unnecessary to be mentioned. But best of all, in my opinion, to mention both the fact that C-400 was soon deployed, and that this relocation was planned in advance. Thus, the information will be the most complete and objective.--Nicoljaus (talk) 14:41, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
- Here is the analytical material where it says: For its part, Moscow has moved additional anti-ship and advanced air defence missiles into the region.--Nicoljaus (talk) 14:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply