Talk:2010–11 Bundesliga

Top scorers nationalities?

I must ask whether it makes sense to place the national flags next to the top scorers as opposed to the current team emblems. I feel this would be of more interest to the readers! TINYMARK 13:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately the use of team emblems would be a copyright violation in this instance, which is why the team name is written next to each player. The use of national flags in top scorer lists is standard practice on Wikipedia. Besides that, the fact that there are currently no Germans among the top ten goalscorers is an interesting enough fact as well. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:00, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Player of the Month

How come this year the player of the month is no longer listed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.78.228.212 (talk) 01:34, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Because no one has bothered adding it to the article. If you have sources for the award, feel free to add it. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:53, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Bundesliga-Logo-2010.png

The image File:Bundesliga-Logo-2010.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

moved from Walter Görlitz talk page

First of all, File:Bundesliga-Logo-2010.png is only to be used in main pages of Bundesliga and 2. Bundesliga, not in a seasonly articles. Same apply to all tradmarked logos.

• You can't have a logo/crest of a team/competition in thier seasonly articles. (you will not find any one).
• If you do want to use any logo, exept of the above, read - Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline, and the use of Template:Logo fur

  – HonorTheKing (talk) 20:54, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

And would you mind pointing to the policies you're referencing? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:39, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

I guess you can't read, I posted above "Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline" and "Template:Logo fur", You could have put it on a search and get a redirect to it.

2nd. You posted on my talk page and than write whan I wrote back on your wall? ha, You did not mention where the reply should be at.
  – HonorTheKing (talk) 23:31, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. That still doesn't answer the question. Where in the guideline?

I did mention where you should reply. And I quote "Please return to pages where you removed the File:Bundesliga-Logo-2010.png with the comment of 'non-free use rationale' and explain why it was removed in full with links to all of the relevant policies and why they apply." (emphasis mine). Since you removed it from two related pages either would have been adequate. Instead you went to my talk page. When I moved it here you stated that I didn't mention where you should reply. I'll accept you striking that statement as an apology. I also respect that English isn't your first language, but rather than accusing me of something, asking would have been more WP:CIVIL.

Now that this is out of the way. Please answer the questions and this time, please be WP:CIVIL about it. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:53, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

The reason I want you to be specific is because I've had to deal with copyright police like you and I don't want to get into edit wars. If we provide fair use rationale, will you come up with some other rule such as league seasons don't qualify for fair use guidelines, or it's a discography, or a compilation of statistics, or some other categorization that precludes it from qualifying for fair use exemptions. I don't want to play games about this. I would like you to explain everything to me as though I had never read any of the guidelines since they seem to change to suit the needs of whoever is applying them. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:58, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Folks, since the respective parameters are built into Template:Infobox football league season, which hence results in potential copyright trouble for more than just the Bundesliga articles (and there indeed are quite some season articles with added league logos), I would suggest to ask the copyright/fair-use question at WT:FOOTY rather than in here. If it is okay to have the logos, fine, if not, just remove the parameters from the template (and clean up affected articles). --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 09:12, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Or explain in the template. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:56, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

As the comment is on the image issue, see [Here] (under Licensing)

It says -

This image does not meet Wikipedia's non-free content policy. The image needs a separate fair-use rationale for each article that links to (or names) the article it is used in. An explanation of how to do this can be found at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline – the easiest way to add a fair-use rationale is with a template such as {{non-free use rationale}}. If this is not fixed within a week, the image will be removed from any articles without a proper rationale.
Please remove this tag once the problem is fixed.

This image does not have an adequate rationale for the following article(s):

• 2010–11 Fußball-Bundesliga
• 2010–11 2. Fußball-Bundesliga

That was set on 10 February 2011, by the fair use bot.

You were given 7 days to fix the issue, as you did not do so, I had to fix it and remove per template, 75 days later!, (It had 10 extra weeks to fix, but no one do so). -
  – HonorTheKing (talk) 15:04, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Once again you're answering the part you feel like answering. If you look at other leagues' season articles, none of them have the league logo. So if we give the fair use rationale, which is easy enough to add, will it be removed for another reason? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

And you didn't have to do anything. It's not your job :) --Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:09, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010–11 Bundesliga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100724121650/http://bundesliga.theoffside.com/teams/new-ball-new-logo-new-season.html to http://bundesliga.theoffside.com/teams/new-ball-new-logo-new-season.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)