Talk:1998 Comfrey–St. Peter tornado outbreak/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   WP:MOSNUM requires hard (non-breaking) spaces between numbers and their units. e.g. 150 km/h (click "edit" to see the symbol that makes a hard space). GA reviews don't mind this, but FAC ones certainly do.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   We talked about the image licenses and I am confident that they will be sorted out

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Plasticup ^T/C 19:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)