Talk:1982 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship game/GA2

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Will211 (talk · contribs) 01:59, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply


This will be my next article I review. I will look at it soon. Will211 (talk) 01:59, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

It is well written edit

the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct  

and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.  

Lead edit

  • The Dean Smith led North Carolina were anchored by Junior and First–team All-American James Worthy. -Sentence dose not make sense.
  • winning it all in 1984. -Informal and should be changed.

These are the only problems I have found with the lead. Will211|Chatter 03:49, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Fixed these a couple of days ago, just forgot to say i did. Disc Wheel (T + C) 01:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Background edit

Section looks okay. Will211|Chatter 05:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Rest of Article edit

I've reviewed this section and made several minor changes, therefore grammar and spelling are all (or at least should be) correct. Will211|Chatter 04:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Verifiable with no original research edit

it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline  

all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines  

it contains no original research  

it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism  

Neutral edit

it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each  

Stable edit

it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute  

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate edit

images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content  

images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions  

Overall edit

Review coming soon. Will211|Chatter 23:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the lack of a review. I've found myself very busy lately with little time. I hope to get the review up by the end of the weekend. Will211|Chatter 04:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I have made some minor edits but the article as a whole looks to pass GA criteria. One thing I would like to point out is try to be a bit more formal with writing, rather than calling North Carolina "Carolina", stick with formality and say "North Carolina." You can look through my edits if you would like to see what I mean. Okay, that aside, I plan on promoting this to GA, nice work on writing with detail without making the article excessive and boring. Good Work! Will211|Chatter 04:54, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply