Talk:Ⱨajoti Miⱨnati
(Redirected from Talk:Ңajoti Miⱨnati)
Latest comment: 6 months ago by PrimalMustelid in topic Did you know nomination
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Ⱨajoti Miⱨnati appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 May 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 01:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the literary magazine Adabijoti Soveti was the sole Jewish-Bukharian language publication remaining by the time of the switch to Cyrillic script 1939–1940? Source: Levin, Zeev. Reclaiming the Cultural Wastelands. in Collectivization and Social Engineering: Soviet Administration and the Jews of Uzbekistan, 1917-1939. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2015.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Antimonumento 5J
- Comment: I'm having issues with saving this under the correct article title. Could it be moved to Template:Did you know nominations/Ңajoti Miⱨnati?
Created by Soman (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 378 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Soman (talk) 09:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC).
- I'll review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: I moved the title to your request. As for the article, it looks alright. AGF on the offline hook source. Approving. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note to both Soman and BeanieFan11: template pages should not be moved even if they don't use the exact name of the article. There are fields that would need to be fixed beyond the hook article name, such as in the DYK header template, the DYK nom pages template (last field only if the article is moved but this template is not), and the first field in DYKmake. By moving this, you effectively orphaned it as far as the bot is concerned, which is why this hadn't been moved to the Approved page though it was approved four days ago. I'll be fixing the Nominations page next, so the bot can figure out that this needs moving, which it can't do with redirected template pages. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)