Talk:Ålgård Line

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Dr. Blofeld in topic Map?
Good articleÅlgård Line has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 4, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 26, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that when the Ålgård Line opened in 1924, it was the last state-owned railway in Norway to be built with narrow gauge?

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ålgård Line/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:44, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: two disambiguations fixed.diff

Linkrot: no dead links found.

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    The prose is "reasonably well written", I made a small number of copy-edits.diff Complies sufficiently with the MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Online sources check out, I assume good faith for print sources.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Thorough, whilst remaining focussed on the subject.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Correctly tagged and captioned.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    I have no hesitation in passing this as a good article. Congratulations! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:24, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for taking the time to review the articles. Your feedback is continuing to make me an ever better Wikipedian. Arsenikk (talk) 20:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Map?

edit

Could you provide a map? Dr. Blofeld White cat 17:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply