Talk:Called Up Sent Down: The Bevin Boys' War
(Redirected from Talk:"Called Up Sent Down": The Bevin Boys' War)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Aoidh in topic Did you know nomination
This article was nominated for deletion on 17 December 2022. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This page was proposed for deletion by Asilvering (talk · contribs) on 4 November 2022. |
A fact from Called Up Sent Down: The Bevin Boys' War appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 January 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
editFrom what I see, this book does not appear to meet notability standards as per Wikipedia:Notability_(books). Does anyone see any points or references to demonstrate its notability? KeepItGoingForward (talk) 22:44, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Aoidh (talk) 01:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Called Up Sent Down: The Bevin Boys' War describes the experiences of young men "from labourers to barristers" who were conscripted to work as coal miners in Britain during the Second World War? Source: https://www.warwickshireias.org/books
- Reviewed: French law of 29 December 1915
5x expanded by Philafrenzy (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy (talk) at 23:57, 24 December 2022 (UTC).
- Reviewing
- Article is new enough (expanded 5x from 17 Dec and nominated on 24 Dec)
- Well written, neutral and supported by inline citations.
- Long enough
- No copyvio issue on Earwig
- Hook is short enough, correctly formatted and supported by inline citation.
- QPQ done
Good to go. Papamac (talk) 16:47, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- Quotes in article title have been removed so removed here too. Philafrenzy (talk) 18:10, 29 December 2022 (UTC)