Neocolonialism is the control by a state (usually, a former colonial power) over another nominally independent state (usually, a former colony) through indirect means.[1][2][3] The term neocolonialism was first used after World War II to refer to the continuing dependence of former colonies on foreign countries, but its meaning soon broadened to apply, more generally, to places where the power of developed countries was used to produce a colonial-like exploitation.[3]

Neocolonialism takes the form of economic imperialism, globalization, cultural imperialism and conditional aid to influence or control a developing country instead of the previous colonial methods of direct military control or indirect political control (hegemony). Neocolonialism differs from standard globalisation and development aid in that it typically results in a relationship of dependence, subservience, or financial obligation towards the neocolonialist nation.

Coined by the French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre in 1956,[4][5] it was first used by Kwame Nkrumah in the context of African countries undergoing decolonisation in the 1960s. Neocolonialism is also discussed in the works of Western thinkers such as Sartre (Colonialism and Neocolonialism, 1964)[6] and Noam Chomsky (The Washington Connection and Third World Fascism, 1979).[7]

Term

edit

Origins

edit

When first proposed, the neocolonialism was applied to European countries' continued economic and cultural relationships with their former colonies, those African countries that had been liberated in the aftermath of Second World War. At the 1962 National Union of Popular Forces conference, Mehdi Ben Barka, the Moroccan political organizer and later chair of the Tricontinental Conference 1966, used the term al-isti'mar al-jadid (Arabic: الاستعمار الجديد "the new colonialism") to describe the political trends in Africa in the early sixties.[8]

الاستعمار الجديد عبارة عن سياسة تعمل من جهة على منح الاستقلال السياسي، وعند الاقتضاء إنشاء دول مصطنعة لا حظ لها في وجود ذاتي، ومن جهة أخرى، تعمل على تقديم مساعدات مصحوبة بوعود تحقيق رفاهية تكون قواعدها في الحقيقة خارج القارة الإفريقية.

"Neo-colonialism is a policy that functions on one hand through granting political independence and, when necessary, creating artificial states that have no chance of sovereignty, and on the other hand, through providing 'assistance' accompanied by promises of achieving prosperity, though its bases are in fact outside the African continent."

Mehdi Ben Barka, The Revolutionary Option in Morocco (May 1962)

 
Kwame Nkrumah (pictured on a Soviet postage stamp), president of Ghana (1960–1966), coined the term "neocolonialism".

Kwame Nkrumah, president of Ghana from 1960 to 1966, is credited with coining the term, which appeared in the 1963 preamble of the Organisation of African Unity Charter, and was the title of his 1965 book, Neo-Colonialism, The Last Stage of Imperialism.[9] In his book the President of Ghana exposes the workings of International monopoly capitalism in Africa. For him Neo-colonialism, insidious and complex, is even more dangerous than the old colonialism and shows how meaningless political freedom can be without economic independence. Nkrumah theoretically developed and extended to the post–World War II 20th century the socio-economic and political arguments presented by Lenin in the pamphlet Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1917). The pamphlet frames 19th-century imperialism as the logical extension of geopolitical power, to meet the financial investment needs of the political economy of capitalism.[10]

In Neo-Colonialism, the Last Stage of Imperialism, Kwame Nkrumah wrote:

In place of colonialism, as the main instrument of imperialism, we have today neo-colonialism ... [which] like colonialism, is an attempt to export the social conflicts of the capitalist countries. ...

The result of neo-colonialism is that foreign capital is used for the exploitation rather than for the development of the less developed parts of the world. Investment, under neo-colonialism, increases, rather than decreases, the gap between the rich and the poor countries of the world. The struggle against neo-colonialism is not aimed at excluding the capital of the developed world from operating in less developed countries. It is also dubious in consideration of the name given being strongly related to the concept of colonialism itself. It is aimed at preventing the financial power of the developed countries being used in such a way as to impoverish the less developed.[11]

The essence of neo-colonialism is that the State which is subject to it is, in theory, independent and has all the outward trappings of international sovereignty. In reality its economic system and thus its political policy is directed from outside.

Neocolonial economic dominance

edit
 
People in Brisbane protesting Australia's claim on East Timorese oil, in May 2017

In 1961, regarding the economic mechanism of neocolonial control, in the speech Cuba: Historical Exception or Vanguard in the Anti-colonial Struggle?, Argentine revolutionary Che Guevara said:

We, politely referred to as "underdeveloped", in truth, are colonial, semi-colonial or dependent countries. We are countries whose economies have been distorted by imperialism, which has abnormally developed those branches of industry or agriculture needed to complement its complex economy. "Underdevelopment", or distorted development, brings a dangerous specialisation in raw materials, inherent in which is the threat of hunger for all our peoples. We, the "underdeveloped", are also those with the single crop, the single product, the single market. A single product whose uncertain sale depends on a single market imposing and fixing conditions. That is the great formula for imperialist economic domination.[12]

Dependency theory

edit

Dependency theory is the theoretical description of economic neocolonialism. It proposes that the global economic system comprises wealthy countries at the centre, and poor countries at the periphery. Economic neocolonialism extracts the human and natural resources of a poor country to flow to the economies of the wealthy countries. It claims that the poverty of the peripheral countries is the result of how they are integrated in the global economic system. Dependency theory derives from the Marxist analysis of economic inequalities within the world's system of economies, thus, under-development of the periphery is a direct result of development in the centre. It includes the concept of the late 19th century semi-colony.[13] It contrasts the Marxist perspective of the theory of colonial dependency with capitalist economics. The latter proposes that poverty is a development stage in the poor country's progress towards full integration in the global economic system. Proponents of dependency theory, such as Venezuelan historian Federico Brito Figueroa, who investigated the socioeconomic bases of neocolonial dependency, influenced the thinking of the former President of Venezuela, Hugo Chávez.[citation needed]

Cold War

edit

During the mid-to-late 20th century, in the course of the ideological conflict between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R., each country and its satellite states accused each other of practising neocolonialism in their imperial and hegemonic pursuits.[14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The struggle included proxy wars, fought by client states in the decolonised countries. Cuba, the Warsaw Pact bloc, Egypt under Gamal Abdel Nasser (1956–1970) et al. accused the U.S. of sponsoring anti-democratic governments whose regimes did not represent the interests of their people and of overthrowing elected governments (African, Asian, Latin American) that did not support U.S. geopolitical interests.[citation needed]

In the 1960s, under the leadership of Chairman Mehdi Ben Barka, the Cuban Tricontinental Conference (Organisation of Solidarity with the People of Asia, Africa and Latin America) recognised and supported the validity of revolutionary anti-colonialism as a means for colonised peoples of the Third World to achieve self-determination, a policy which angered the U.S. and France. Moreover, Chairman Barka headed the Commission on Neocolonialism, which dealt with the work to resolve the neocolonial involvement of colonial powers in decolonised counties; and said that the U.S., as the leading capitalist country of the world, was, in practise, the principal neocolonialist political actor.[citation needed]

Multinational corporations

edit

Critics of neocolonialism also argue that investment by multinational corporations enriches few in underdeveloped countries and causes humanitarian, environmental and ecological damage to their populations. They argue that this results in unsustainable development and perpetual underdevelopment. These countries remain reservoirs of cheap labor and raw materials, while restricting access to advanced production techniques to develop their own economies. In some countries, monopolization of natural resources, while initially leading to an influx of investment, is often followed by increases in unemployment, poverty and a decline in per-capita income.[21]

In the West African nations of Guinea-Bissau, Senegal and Mauritania, fishing was historically central to the economy. Beginning in 1979, the European Union began negotiating contracts with governments for fishing off the coast of West Africa. Unsustainable commercial over-fishing by foreign fleets played a significant role in large-scale unemployment and migration of people across the region.[22] This violates the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which recognises the importance of fishing to local communities and insists that government fishing agreements with foreign companies should target only surplus stocks.[23]

Oxfam's 2024 report "Inequality, Inc" concludes that multinational corporations located in the Global North are "perpetuating a colonial style 'extractivist' model" across the Global South as the economies of the latter "are locked into exporting primary commodities, from copper to coffee" to these multinationals.[24]

International borrowing

edit

American economist Jeffrey Sachs recommended that the entire African debt (c. US$200 billion) be dismissed, and recommended that African nations not repay either the World Bank or the International Monetary Fund (IMF):[25]

The time has come to end this charade. The debts are unaffordable. If they won't cancel the debts, I would suggest obstruction; you do it, yourselves. Africa should say: "Thank you very much, but we need this money to meet the needs of children who are dying, right now, so, we will put the debt-servicing payments into urgent social investment in health, education, drinking water, the control of AIDS, and other needs".

Conservation and neocolonialism

edit

Wallerstein, and separately Frank, claim that the modern conservation movement, as practiced by international organisations such as the World Wide Fund for Nature, inadvertently developed a neocolonial relationship with underdeveloped nations.[26]

Science

edit

Neo-colonial research or neo-colonial science,[27][28] frequently described as helicopter research,[27] parachute science[29][30] or research,[31] parasitic research,[32][33] or safari study,[34] is when researchers from wealthier countries go to a developing country, collect information, travel back to their country, analyze the data and samples, and publish the results with no or little involvement of local researchers. A 2003 study by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences found that 70% of articles in a random sample of publications about least-developed countries did not include a local research co-author.[28]

Frequently, during this kind of research, the local colleagues might be used to provide logistics support as fixers but are not engaged for their expertise or given credit for their participation in the research. Scientific publications resulting from parachute science frequently only contribute to the career of the scientists from rich countries, thus limiting the development of local science capacity (such as funded research centers) and the careers of local scientists.[27] This form of "colonial" science has reverberations of 19th century scientific practices of treating non-Western participants as "others" in order to advance colonialism—and critics call for the end of these extractivist practices in order to decolonize knowledge.[35][36]

This kind of research approach reduces the quality of research because international researchers may not ask the right questions or draw connections to local issues.[37] The result of this approach is that local communities are unable to leverage the research to their own advantage.[30] Ultimately, especially for fields dealing with global issues like conservation biology which rely on local communities to implement solutions, neo-colonial science prevents institutionalization of the findings in local communities in order to address issues being studied by scientists.[30][35]

Former colonial powers and Africa

edit

Françafrique

edit
 
Usage of:

The representative example of European neocolonialism is Françafrique, the "French Africa" constituted by the continued close relationships between France and its former African colonies.[citation needed]

In 1955, the initial usage of the term "French Africa", by President Félix Houphouët-Boigny of Ivory Coast, denoted positive social, cultural and economic Franco–African relations. It was later applied by neocolonialism critics to describe an imbalanced international relation.[citation needed]

Neocolonialism was used to describe a type of foreign intervention in countries belonging to the Pan-Africanist movement, as well as the Asian–African Conference of Bandung (1955), which led to the Non-Aligned Movement (1961). Neocolonialism was formally defined by the All-African Peoples' Conference (AAPC) and published in the Resolution on Neo-colonialism. At both the Tunis conference (1960) and the Cairo conference (1961), AAPC described the actions of the French Community of independent states, organised by France, as neocolonial.[39][40]

The politician Jacques Foccart, the principal adviser for African matters to French presidents Charles de Gaulle (1958–1969) and Georges Pompidou (1969–1974), was the principal proponent of Françafrique.[41]

The works of Verschave and Beti reported a forty-year, post-independence relationship with France's former colonial peoples, which featured colonial garrisons in situ and monopolies by French multinational corporations, usually for the exploitation of mineral resources. It was argued that the African leaders with close ties to France—especially during the Soviet–American Cold War (1945–1992)—acted more as agents of French business and geopolitical interests than as the national leaders of sovereign states. Cited examples are Omar Bongo (Gabon), Félix Houphouët-Boigny (Ivory Coast), Gnassingbé Eyadéma (Togo), Denis Sassou-Nguesso (Republic of the Congo), Idriss Déby (Chad), and Hamani Diori (Niger).[citation needed]

Belgian Congo

edit

Belgium's approach to Belgian Congo has been characterized as a quintessential example of neocolonialism, as the Belgians embraced rapid decolonization of the Congo with the expectation that the newly independent state would become dependent on Belgium. This dependence would allow the Belgians to exert control over Congo, even though Congo was formally independent.[1]

After the decolonisation of Belgian Congo, Belgium continued to control, through the Société Générale de Belgique, an estimated 70% of the Congolese economy following the decolonisation process. The most contested part was in the province of Katanga where the Union Minière du Haut Katanga, part of the Société, controlled the mineral-resource-rich province. After a failed attempt to nationalise the mining industry in the 1960s, it was reopened to foreign investment.[citation needed]

United States

edit

There is an ongoing debate about whether certain actions by the United States should be considered neocolonialism.[42] Nayna J. Jhaveri, writing in Antipode, views the 2003 invasion of Iraq as a form of "petroimperialism", believing that the U.S. was motivated to go to war to attain vital oil reserves, rather than to pursue the U.S. government's official rationale for the Iraq War.[43]

Noam Chomsky has been a prominent critic of "American imperialism";[44] he believes that the basic principle of the foreign policy of the United States is the establishment of "open societies" that are economically and politically controlled by the United States and where U.S.-based businesses can prosper.[45] He argues that the U.S. seeks to suppress any movements within these countries that are not compliant with U.S. interests and to ensure that U.S.-friendly governments are placed in power.[46] He believes that official accounts of U.S. operations abroad have consistently whitewashed U.S. actions in order to present them as having benevolent motives in spreading democracy.[47] Examples he regularly cites are the actions of the United States in Vietnam, the Philippines, Latin America, and the Middle East.[47]

Chalmers Johnson argued in 2004 that America's version of the colony is the military base.[48] Johnson wrote numerous books, including three examinations of the consequences of what he called the "American Empire".[49] Chip Pitts argued similarly in 2006 that enduring United States bases in Iraq suggested a vision of "Iraq as a colony".[50]

David Vine, author of Base Nation: How U.S. Military Bases Overseas Harm America and the World (2015), said the US had bases in 45 "less-than-democratic" countries and territories. He quotes political scientist Kent Calder: "The United States tends to support dictators [and other undemocratic regimes] in nations where it enjoys basing facilities".[51]

China

edit

The People's Republic of China has built increasingly strong ties with some African, Asian, European and Latin American nations which has led to accusations of colonialism,[52][53] As of August 2007, an estimated 750,000 Chinese nationals were working or living for extended periods in Africa.[54][55] In the 1980s and 90s, China continued to purchase natural resources—petroleum and minerals—from Africa to fuel the Chinese economy and to finance international business enterprises.[56][57] In 2006, trade had increased to $50 billion expanding to $500 billion by 2016.[58]

In Africa, China has loaned $95.5 billion to various countries between 2000 and 2015, the majority being spent on power generation and infrastructure.[59] Cases in which this has ended with China acquiring foreign land have led to accusations of "debt-trap diplomacy".[60][61][62] Other analysts say that China's activities "are goodwill for later investment opportunities or an effort to stockpile international support for contentious political issues".[63]

In 2018, Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad cancelled two China-funded projects. He also talked about fears of Malaysia becoming "indebted" and of a "new version of colonialism".[64][65] He later clarified that he did not refer to the Belt and Road Initiative or China with this.[66][67]

According to Mark Langan in 2017, China, Western actors, and other emerging powers pursue their own interests at the expense of African interests. Western actors depict China as a threat to Africa, while depicting European and American involvement in Africa as being virtuous.[68]

Russia

edit

Russia currently occupies parts of neighboring states. These occupied territories are Transnistria (part of Moldova); Abkhazia and South Ossetia (part of Georgia); and five provinces of Ukraine, which it has illegally annexed. Russia has also established effective political domination over Belarus, through the Union State.[69] Historian Timothy Snyder defines Russia's war against Ukraine as "a colonial war, in the sense that Russia meant to conquer, dominate, displace and exploit" the country and its people.[70] Russia has been accused of colonialism in Crimea, which it annexed in 2014, by enforced Russification, passportization, and by settling Russian citizens on the peninsula and forcing out Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars.[71]

 
Russian mercenaries standing guard near an armored vehicle in the Central African Republic

The Wagner Group, a Russian state-funded[72] private military company (PMC), has provided military support, security and protection for several autocratic regimes in Africa since 2017. In return, Russian and Wagner-linked companies have been given privileged access to those countries' natural resources, such as rights to gold and diamond mines, while the Russian military has been given access to strategic locations such as airbases and ports.[73][74] This has been described as a neo-colonial and neo-imperialist kind of state capture, whereby Russia gains sway over countries by helping to keep the ruling regime in power and making them reliant on its protection, while generating economic and political benefits for Russia, without benefitting the local population.[75][76][77] Russia has also gained geopolitical influence in Africa through election interference and spreading pro-Russian propaganda and anti-Western disinformation.[78][79] Russian PMCs have been active in the Central African Republic, Sudan, Libya, Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger and Mozambique, among other countries. They have been accused of human rights abuses and killing civilians.[73] In 2024, the Wagner Group in Africa was merged into a new 'Africa Corps' under the direct control of Russia's Ministry of Defense.[80] Analysts for the Russian government have privately acknowledged the neo-colonial nature of Russia's policy towards Africa.[81]

The "Russian world" is a term used by the Russian government and Russian nationalists for territories and communities with a historical, cultural, or spiritual tie to Russia.[69] The Kremlin meanwhile refers to the Russian diaspora and Russian-speakers in other countries as "Russian compatriots". In her book Beyond Crimea: The New Russian Empire (2016), Agnia Grigas highlights how ideas like the "Russian world" and "Russian compatriots" have become an "instrument of Russian neo-imperial aims".[82] The Kremlin has sought influence over its "compatriots" by offering them Russian citizenship and passports (passportization), and in some cases eventually calling for their military protection.[82] Grigas writes that the Kremlin uses the existence of these "compatriots" to "gain influence over and challenge the sovereignty of foreign states and at times even take over territories".[82]

Other countries and entities

edit

Iran

edit

The Iranian government has been called an example of neocolonialism.[83] The motivation for Iran is not economic, but religious.[84] After its establishment in 1979, Iran sought to export Shia Islam globally and position itself as a force in world political structures.[84] Africa's Muslims present a unique opportunity in Iran's dominance in the Muslim world.[84] Iran is able to use these African communities to circumvent economic sanctions and move arms, man power, and nuclear technology.[84]

Iran exerts its influence through humanitarian initiatives, such as those seen in Ghana.[85] Through the building of hospitals, schools, and agricultural projects Iran uses "soft power" to assert its influence in Western Africa.[85]

Niue

edit

The government of Niue has been trying to get back access to its domain name, .nu.[86] The country signed a deal with a Massachusetts-based non-profit in 1999 that gave away rights to the domain name. Management of the domain name has since shifted to a Swedish organisation. The Niue government is currently fighting on two fronts to get back control on its domain name, including with the ICANN.[87] Toke Talagi, the long-serving Premier of Niue who died in 2020, called it a form of neocolonialism.[88]

South Korea

edit

To ensure a reliable, long-term supply of food, the South Korean government and powerful Korean multinationals bought farming rights to millions of hectares of agricultural land in under-developed countries.[89]

South Korea's RG Energy Resources Asset Management CEO Park Yong-soo stressed that "the nation does not produce a single drop of crude oil and other key industrial minerals. To power economic growth and support people's livelihoods, we cannot emphasise too much that securing natural resources in foreign countries is a must for our future survival."[90] The head of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Jacques Diouf, stated that the rise in land deals could create a form of "neocolonialism", with poor states producing food for the rich at the expense of their own hungry people.[91]

In 2008, South Korean multinational Daewoo Logistics secured 1.3 million hectares of farmland in Madagascar to grow maize and crops for biofuels. Roughly half of the country's arable land, as well as rainforests were to be converted into palm and corn monocultures, producing food for export from a country where a third of the population and 50 percent of children under five are malnourished, using South African workers instead of locals. Local residents were not consulted or informed, despite being dependent on the land for food and income. The controversial deal played a major part in prolonged anti-government protests that resulted in over a hundred deaths.[89] This was a source of popular resentment that contributed to the fall of then-President Marc Ravalomanana. The new president, Andry Rajoelina, cancelled the deal.[92] Tanzania later announced that South Korea was in talks to develop 100,000 hectares for food production and processing for 700 to 800 billion won. Scheduled to be completed in 2010, it was to be the largest single piece of overseas South Korean agricultural infrastructure ever built.[89]

In 2009, Hyundai Heavy Industries acquired a majority stake in a company cultivating 10,000 hectares of farmland in the Russian Far East and a South Korean provincial government secured 95,000 hectares of farmland in Oriental Mindoro, central Philippines, to grow corn. The South Jeolla province became the first provincial government to benefit from a new central government fund to develop farmland overseas, receiving a loan of $1.9 million. The project was expected to produce 10,000 tonnes of feed in the first year.[93] South Korean multinationals and provincial governments purchased land in Sulawesi, Indonesia, Cambodia and Bulgan, Mongolia. The national South Korean government announced its intention to invest 30 billion won in land in Paraguay and Uruguay. As of 2009 discussions with Laos, Myanmar and Senegal were underway.[89]

Cultural approaches

edit

Although the concept of neocolonialism was originally developed within a Marxist theoretical framework and is generally employed by the political left, the term "neocolonialism" is found in other theoretical frameworks.

Coloniality

edit

"Coloniality" claims that knowledge production is strongly influenced by the context of the person producing the knowledge and that this has further disadvantaged developing countries with limited knowledge production infrastructure. It originated among critics of subaltern theories, which, although strongly de-colonial, are less concerned with the source of knowledge.[94]

Cultural theory

edit
 
Map of the European Union in the world, with Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) in green and Outermost Regions (OMR) in blue

One variant of neocolonialism theory critiques cultural colonialism, the desire of wealthy nations to control other nations' values and perceptions through cultural means such as media, language, education[95] and religion, ultimately for economic reasons. One impact of this is "colonial mentality", feelings of inferiority that lead post-colonial societies to latch onto physical and cultural differences between the foreigners and themselves. Foreign ways become held in higher esteem than indigenous ways. Given that colonists and colonisers were generally of different races, the colonised may over time hold that the colonisers' race was responsible for their superiority. Rejections of the colonisers culture, such as the Negritude movement, have been employed to overcome these associations. Post-colonial importation or continuation of cultural mores or elements may be regarded as a form of neocolonialism.[citation needed]

Postcolonialism

edit

Post-colonialism theories in philosophy, political science, literature and film deal with the cultural legacy of colonial rule. Post-colonialism studies examine how once-colonised writers articulate their national identity; how knowledge about the colonised was generated and applied in service to the interests of the coloniser; and how colonialist literature justified colonialism by presenting the colonised people as inferior whose society, culture and economy must be managed for them. Post-colonial studies incorporate subaltern studies of "history from below"; post-colonial cultural evolution; the psychopathology of colonisation (by Frantz Fanon); and the cinema of film makers such as the Cuban Third Cinema, e.g. Tomás Gutiérrez Alea, and Kidlat Tahimik.[citation needed]

Critical theory

edit

Critiques of postcolonialism/neocolonialism are evident in literary theory. International relations theory defined "postcolonialism" as a field of study. While the lasting effects of cultural colonialism are of central interest, the intellectual antecedents in cultural critiques of neocolonialism are economic. Critical international relations theory references neocolonialism from Marxist positions as well as postpositivist positions, including postmodernist, postcolonial and feminist approaches. These differ from both realism and liberalism in their epistemological and ontological premises. The neoliberalist approach tends to depict modern forms of colonialism as a benevolent imperialism.[citation needed]

Neocolonialism and gender construction

edit

Concepts of neocolonialism can be found in theoretical works investigating gender outside the global north. Often these conceptions can be seen as erasing gender norms within communities in the global south[96] to create conceptions of gender that align with the global north. Gerise Herndon argues that applying feminism or other theoretical frameworks around gender must look at the relationship between the individual subject, their home country or culture, and the country and culture that exerts neocolonial control over the country. In her piece "Gender Construction and Neocolonialism", Herndon presents the writings of Maryse Condé as an example of grappling with what it means to have your identity constructed by neocolonial powers. Her work explores how women in burgeoning nations rebuilt their identities in the postcolonial period. The task of creating new identities was met with challenges from not only an internal view of what the culture was in these places but also from the external expectations of ex-colonial powers.[97]

An example of the construction of gender norms and conceptions by neocolonial interests is made clear in the Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act introduced in 2009 and passed in 2014. The act expanded upon previously existing laws against sodomy to make gay relationships punishable by life imprisonment. The call for this bill came from Ugandans who claimed traditional African values that did not include homosexuality. This act faced backlash from western countries, citing human rights violations. The United States imposed economic sanctions against Uganda in June 2014 in response to the law, the World Bank indefinitely postponed a $90 million aid loan to Uganda and the governments of Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden and Norway halted aid to Uganda in opposition to the law; the Ugandan government defended the bill and rejected condemnation of it, with the country's authorities stating President Museveni wanted "to demonstrate Uganda's independence in the face of Western pressure and provocation".[98] The Ugandan response was to claim that this was a neocolonialist attack on their culture. Kristen Cheney argued that this is a misrepresentation of neocolonialism at work and that this conception of gender and anti-homosexuality erased historically diverse gender identities in Africa. To Cheney, neocolonialism was found in accepting conservative gender identity politics, specifically those of U.S.-based Evangelical Christians. Before the introduction of this act, conservative Christian groups in the United States had put African religious leaders and politicians on their payroll, reflecting the talking points of U.S.-based Christian evangelism. Cheney argues that this adoption and bankrolling of U.S. conservative Christian evangelist thought in Uganda is the real neocolonialism and effectively erodes any historical gender diversity in Africa.[96]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ a b Stanard, Matthew G. (2018). European Overseas Empire, 1879 – 1999: A Short History. John Wiley & Sons. p. 5. ISBN 978-1-119-13013-0.
  2. ^ Scott, John; Marshall, Gordon (2009), "neo-colonialism", A Dictionary of Sociology, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acref/9780199533008.001.0001, ISBN 978-0-19-953300-8
  3. ^ a b Halperin, Sandra (2023-12-02). "Neocolonialism". Neocolonialism | Definition, Examples, & Facts | Britannica. Britannica.
  4. ^ Ardant, Philippe (1965). "Le néo-colonialisme: thème, mythe et réalité" [Neo-colonialism: theme, myth and reality]. Revue française de science politique (in French). 15 (5): 837–855. doi:10.3406/rfsp.1965.392883.
  5. ^ Sartre, Jean-Paul (March–April 1956). "La Mystification néo-colonialiste" [The Neo-colonialist mystification)]. Les Temps Modernes (in French). 123: 125.
  6. ^ Sartre, Jean-Paul (2001). Colonialism and Neocolonialism. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-415-19146-3.
  7. ^ Chomsky, Noam; Herman, Edward S. (1979). The Washington Connection and Third World Fascism. Black Rose Books. p. 42ff. ISBN 978-0-919618-88-6.
  8. ^ alaikhtiar althawriu fi almaghrib الاختيار الثوري في المغرب [The revolutionary choice in Morocco] (in Arabic). دار الطليعة،. OCLC 754752436.
  9. ^ Arnold, Guy (April 6, 2010). The A to Z of the Non-Aligned Movement and Third World. Scarecrow Press. p. 108. ISBN 978-1-4616-7231-9.
  10. ^ Lenin, Vladimir (1916). Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism. Retrieved August 27, 2021 – via Marxists Internet Archive.
  11. ^ Nkrumah, Kwame. Neo-Colonialism, the Last Stage of Imperialism. Retrieved August 27, 2021 – via Marxists Internet Archive.
  12. ^ Guevara, Che (April 9, 1961). Cuba: Historical exception or vanguard in the anticolonial struggle?. Retrieved August 27, 2021 – via Marxists Internet Archive.
  13. ^ Mandel, Ernest. "Semicolonial Countries and Semi-Industrialised Dependent Countries". New International (5). New York: 149–175.
  14. ^ Kanet, Roger E.; Miner, Deborah N.; Resler, Tamara J. (April 2, 1992). Soviet Foreign Policy in Transition. Cambridge University Press. pp. 149–150. ISBN 978-0-521-41365-7.
  15. ^ Ruether, Rosemary Radford (2008). Christianity and Social Systems: Historical Constructions and Ethical Challenges. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 138. ISBN 978-0-7425-4643-1. Neo-colonialism means that European powers and the United States no longer rule dependent territories, directly through their occupying troops and imperial bureaucracy. Rather, they control the area's resources indirectly, through business corporations and the financial lending institutions they dominate ...
  16. ^ Siddiqi, Yumna (2008). Anxieties of Empire and the Fiction of Intrigue. Columbia University Press. pp. 123–124. ISBN 978-0-231-13808-6. Provides the standard definition of "Neo-colonialism" specific to the US and European colonialism.
  17. ^ Shannon, Thomas R. (1996). An Introduction to the World-system Perspective. Westview Press. pp. 94–95. ISBN 978-0-8133-2452-4.[permanent dead link] Defines "neo-colonialism" as a capitalist phenomenon.
  18. ^ Blanchard, William H. (1996). Neocolonialism American Style, 1960–2000. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 3–12. ISBN 978-0-313-30013-4. Defines "neo-colonialism" on page 7.
  19. ^ Seton-Watson, Hugh (1977). Nations and States: An Enquiry Into the Origins of Nations and the Politics of Nationalism. Methuen. p. 339. ISBN 978-0-416-76810-7. Provides the history of the word "neo-colonialism" as an anti-capitalist term (p. 339); also applicable to the U.S.S.R. (p. 322).
  20. ^ Bennett, Edward M. (2002). "Colonialism and Neo-colonialism". In DeConde, Alexander; Burns, Richard Dean; Logevall, Fredrik (eds.). Encyclopedia of American Foreign Policy (2nd ed.). Simon & Schuster. pp. 285–291. ISBN 0-684-80657-6. Clarifies that neo-colonialism is a practice of the colonial powers, that "the Soviets practiced imperialism, not colonialism".
  21. ^ "World Bank, IMF Threw Colombia Into Tailspin". The Baltimore Sun. April 4, 2002. Archived from the original on September 29, 2012.
  22. ^ LaFraniere, Sharon (January 14, 2008). "Europe Takes Africa's Fish, and Boatloads of Migrants Follow". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  23. ^ United Nations 2007
  24. ^ Riddell, Rebecca; et al. (15 January 2024). "Inequality, Inc.: How corporate power divides our world and the need for a new era of public action". Oxfam International. Retrieved 18 January 2024.
  25. ^ "Africa 'should not pay its debts'". BBC News. July 6, 2004. Retrieved November 23, 2013.
  26. ^ In a manner consistent with Immanuel Wallerstein's world-systems theory (Wallerstein, 1974) and Andre Gunder Frank's dependency theory (Frank, 1975).
  27. ^ a b c Minasny, Budiman; Fiantis, Dian; Mulyanto, Budi; Sulaeman, Yiyi; Widyatmanti, Wirastuti (2020-08-15). "Global soil science research collaboration in the 21st century: Time to end helicopter research". Geoderma. 373: 114299. Bibcode:2020Geode.373k4299M. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114299. ISSN 0016-7061.
  28. ^ a b Dahdouh-Guebas, Farid; Ahimbisibwe, J.; Van Moll, Rita; Koedam, Nico (2003-03-01). "Neo-colonial science by the most industrialised upon the least developed countries in peer-reviewed publishing". Scientometrics. 56 (3): 329–343. doi:10.1023/A:1022374703178. ISSN 1588-2861. S2CID 18463459.
  29. ^ "Q&A: Parachute Science in Coral Reef Research". The Scientist Magazine®. Retrieved 2021-03-24.
  30. ^ a b c "The Problem With 'Parachute Science'". Science Friday. Retrieved 2021-03-24.
  31. ^ "Scientists Say It's Time To End 'Parachute Research'". NPR.org. Retrieved 2021-03-24.
  32. ^ Health, The Lancet Global (2018-06-01). "Closing the door on parachutes and parasites". The Lancet Global Health. 6 (6): e593. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30239-0. ISSN 2214-109X. PMID 29773111. S2CID 21725769.
  33. ^ Smith, James (2018-08-01). "Parasitic and parachute research in global health". The Lancet Global Health. 6 (8): e838. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30315-2. ISSN 2214-109X. PMID 30012263. S2CID 51630341.
  34. ^ "Helicopter Research". TheFreeDictionary.com. Retrieved 2021-03-24.
  35. ^ a b Vos, Asha de. "The Problem of 'Colonial Science'". Scientific American. Retrieved 2021-03-24.
  36. ^ "The Traces of Colonialism in Science". Observatory of Educational Innovation. 20 July 2020. Retrieved 2021-03-24.
  37. ^ Stefanoudis, Paris V.; Licuanan, Wilfredo Y.; Morrison, Tiffany H.; Talma, Sheena; Veitayaki, Joeli; Woodall, Lucy C. (2021-02-22). "Turning the tide of parachute science". Current Biology. 31 (4): R184–R185. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.029. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 33621503.
  38. ^ "African protests over the CFA 'colonial currency'". BBC News. August 30, 2017.
  39. ^ Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice (2005). Africa: The Politics of Independence and Unity. University of Nebraska Press. p. 52. ISBN 0-8032-9856-0. The Cairo meeting did leave an important intellectual legacy, however. It attempted the one serious, collectively agreed-upon definition of neo-colonialism, the key concept in the armory of the revolutionary core of the movement for African unity. Neo-colonialism is defined as 'the survival of the colonial system in spite of formal recognition of political independence in emerging countries'.
  40. ^ Graf, William D. (1981). "Reviewed work: Neocolonialism and African Politics: A Survey of the Impact of Neocolonialism on African Political Behaviour, Yolamu R. Barongo". Canadian Journal of African Studies. 15 (3): 600–602. doi:10.2307/484744. JSTOR 484744. The term, itself, originated in Africa, probably with Nkrumah, and received collective recognition at the 1961 All-African People's Conference.
  41. ^ Whiteman, Kaye (Fall 1997). "The Man Who Ran Françafrique – French Politician Jacques Foccart's Role in France's Colonisation of Africa Under the Leadership of Charles de Gaulle". The National Interest (obituary).
  42. ^ Gratale, Joseph Michael (March 26, 2012). "Walberg, Eric. Postmodern Imperialism: Geopolitics and the Great Games". European Journal of American Studies. doi:10.4000/ejas.9709. ISSN 1991-9336. S2CID 159050841.
  43. ^ Jhaveri, Nayna J. (January 2004). "Petroimperialism: US Oil Interests and the War in Iraq" (PDF). Antipode. 36 (1): 2–11. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2004.00378.x. Retrieved November 25, 2014.
  44. ^ Milne, Seumas (November 7, 2009). "'US foreign policy is straight out of the mafia'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 16, 2021. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
  45. ^ Sperlich 2006, p. 92.
  46. ^ McGilvray 2014, p. 159.
  47. ^ a b McGilvray 2014, p. 13.
  48. ^ Johnson, Chalmers (January 15, 2004). "America's Empire of Bases". TomDispatch. Retrieved January 23, 2020.
  49. ^ "Chalmers Johnson, 1931–2010, on the Last Days of the American Republic". Democracy Now!. November 22, 2010. Archived from the original on January 28, 2023.
  50. ^ Pitts, Chip (November 8, 2006). "The Election on Empire". The National Interest. Retrieved October 8, 2009.
  51. ^ "How U.S. Military Bases Back Dictators, Autocrats, And Military Regimes". The Huffington Post. May 16, 2017.
  52. ^ "Asia Times Online :: China News – Military backs China's Africa adventure". Archived from the original on July 21, 2012.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  53. ^ "Mbeki warns on China-Africa ties". BBC News. December 14, 2006.
  54. ^ "Breaking News, World News & Multimedia".
  55. ^ "Chinese imperialism in Africa | International Communist Current". en.internationalism.org.
  56. ^ "China in Africa". Archived from the original on February 8, 2009.
  57. ^ "Green Left – CHINA: Is China Africa's new imperialist power?". March 12, 2007. Archived from the original on March 12, 2007.
  58. ^ "Is China the new colonial power in Africa?". Taipei Times. November 1, 2006. Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  59. ^ Bräutigam, Deborah (April 12, 2018). "Opinion | U.S. politicians get China in Africa all wrong". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
  60. ^ Beech, Hannah (August 20, 2018). "'We Cannot Afford This': Malaysia Pushes Back Against China's Vision". The New York Times.
  61. ^ Abi-Habib, Maria (June 25, 2018). "How China Got Sri Lanka to Cough Up a Port". The New York Times.
  62. ^ Mutua, Makau. "Why China remains greatest threat to Kenya's sovereignty". The Standard. Retrieved May 6, 2019.
  63. ^ "China in Africa". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 2023-08-27.
  64. ^ "Malaysia's Mahathir warns against 'new colonialism' during China visit". ABC News. August 21, 2018. Retrieved August 23, 2018.
  65. ^ "Mahathir fears new colonialism, cancels 2 Chinese projects on Beijing visit". The Times of India. Retrieved August 23, 2018.
  66. ^ Jaipragas, Bhavan (October 2, 2018). "Is China's belt and road colonialism? Mahathir: not at all". South China Morning Post.
  67. ^ "Dr M: I didn't accuse the Chinese". The Edge Markets. October 3, 2018. Archived from the original on November 24, 2018. Retrieved November 24, 2018.
  68. ^ Langan, Mark (October 11, 2017). Neo-Colonialism and the Poverty of 'Development' in Africa. Springer. pp. 94–101. ISBN 978-3-319-58571-0. While the 'China Threat' discourse deployed by Western actors paints China as the 'other' in contrast to the apparently virtuous intervention of Europe and the USA, nevertheless, it would be misguided to maintain the opposite stance [...] It is important, however, to avoid the 'othering' of China as per the 'China Threat' discourse. China is not alone in the perpetuation of conditions of mal-governance and ill-being. Western actors—as well as other emerging powers—facilitate their own economic and political interests via aid and trade to the detriment of African sovereignty.
  69. ^ a b Mankoff, Jeffrey (2022). "The War in Ukraine and Eurasia's New Imperial Moment". The Washington Quarterly. 45 (2): 127–128. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2022.2090761.
  70. ^ "'Russia's war in Ukraine will be seen as colonial war' – interview with Timothy Snyder". Lithuanian National Radio and Television. 21 November 2023.
  71. ^ Yermakova, Olena (August 2021). "The silent Russian colonisation of Crimea". New Eastern Europe.
  72. ^ "Wagner mutiny: Group fully funded by Russia, says Putin". BBC News. 27 June 2023. Archived from the original on 4 September 2023. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  73. ^ a b "How Russia's Wagner Group funds its role in Putin's Ukraine war by plundering Africa's resources". CBS News. 16 May 2023. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 25 August 2023.
  74. ^ "Russia's Wagner Group in Africa: Influence, commercial concessions, rights violations, and counterinsurgency failure". Brookings Institution. 8 February 2022. Archived from the original on 26 August 2024. Retrieved 25 August 2023.
  75. ^ Doboš, Bohumil; Purton, Alexander (2024). "Proxy Neo-colonialism? The Case of Wagner Group in the Central African Republic". Insight on Africa. 16 (1): 7–21. doi:10.1177/09750878231209705.
  76. ^ "How Russia is pursuing state capture in Africa". London School of Economics. 21 March 2022.
  77. ^ "Russia 'destabilising the West' with mercenaries in Africa, defence chiefs warn". The Daily Telegraph. 10 March 2022.
  78. ^ "Fact check: Russia's influence on Africa". Deutsche Welle. 27 July 2023.
  79. ^ "Tracking Russian Interference to Derail Democracy in Africa". Africa Center for Strategic Studies. 21 June 2023.
  80. ^ "More control, less deniability: what next for Russia in Africa after Wagner?". The Guardian. 21 May 2024.
  81. ^ Watling, Jack; Danylyuk, Oleksandr; Reynolds, Nick (20 February 2024). "The Threat from Russia's Unconventional Warfare Beyond Ukraine, 2022–24" (PDF). Royal United Services Institute. pp. 14–23.
  82. ^ a b c Grigas, Agnia (2016). Beyond Crimea: The New Russian Empire. Yale University Press. pp. 2–3, 9.
  83. ^ Aslany, Maryam (2023-09-25). "How the Islamic Republic colonised Iran". New Statesman. Retrieved 2023-10-03.
  84. ^ a b c d Segell, Glen (2019). "Neo-colonialism in Africa and the Cases of Turkey and Iran". Insight on Africa. 11 (2): 184–199. doi:10.1177/0975087819845197. ISSN 0975-0878. S2CID 201363344.
  85. ^ a b Mohammed, Salisu (January 2023). Iran Foreign Policy: Humanitarian Soft Power and the Search for Status in Ghana (PhD thesis). Qatar University.
  86. ^ "De 20 jaar lange strijd om het domein .nu raakt ook Nederlanders" [The 20-year long battle for the .nu domain also affects the Dutch]. Tweakers (in Dutch). Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  87. ^ "The Government of Niue Launches Proceedings With ICANN to Reclaim Its .nu Top-Level Domain". circleid.com. Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  88. ^ "'Digital colonisation': A tiny island nation just launched a major effort to win back control of its top-level internet domain". Business Insider. December 16, 2020. Archived from the original on December 16, 2020.
  89. ^ a b c d "Korea's Overseas Development Backfires". Korea Times. December 4, 2009.
  90. ^ "Coherent State Support Key to Overseas Resources Development". Korea Times. July 22, 2009. Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  91. ^ "Rich countries launch great land grab to safeguard food supply". The Guardian. November 22, 2008. Retrieved March 11, 2022.
  92. ^ "Madagascar scraps Daewoo farm deal". Financial Times. December 17, 2015. Archived from the original on December 17, 2015. Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  93. ^ "S. Korea Leases Philippine Farmland to Grow Corn". Korea Times. July 16, 2009. Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  94. ^ Grosfoguel, Ramon (April 3, 2007). "The Epistemic Decolonial Turn". Cultural Studies. 21 (2–3): 211–223. doi:10.1080/09502380601162514. S2CID 145761920.
  95. ^ Sabrin, Mohammed (2013). "Exploring the Intellectual Foundations of Egyptian National Education" (PDF). www.getd.libs.uga.edu/.
  96. ^ a b Cheney, Kristen (September 2012). "Locating Neocolonialism, 'Tradition', and Human Rights in Uganda's 'Gay Death Penalty'". African Studies Review. 55 (2): 77–95. doi:10.1353/arw.2012.0031. ISSN 0002-0206. S2CID 144478765.
  97. ^ Herndon, Gerise (1993). "Gender Construction and Neocolonialism". World Literature Today. 67 (4): 731–736. doi:10.2307/40149571. JSTOR 40149571.
  98. ^ "US imposes sanctions on Uganda for anti-gay law". BBC News. 19 June 2014. Retrieved 30 November 2018.

Bibliography

edit
  • McGilvray, James (2014). Chomsky: Language, Mind, Politics (Second ed.). Cambridge: Polity. ISBN 978-0-7456-4989-4.

Further reading

edit
  • Agyeman, Opoku (1992). Nkrumah's Ghana and East Africa: Pan-Africanism and African interstate relations. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
  • Ankerl, Guy (2000). Global communication without universal civilisation. INU societal research. Vol. 1: Coexisting contemporary civilisations : Arabo-Muslim, Bharati, Chinese, and Western. Geneva: INU Press. ISBN 2-88155-004-5.
  • Ashcroft, Bill, ed. (1995). The post-colonial studies reader. et al. London: Routledge.
  • Barongo, Yolamu R. (1980). Neo-colonialism and African politics: A survey of the impact of neo-colonialism on African political behavior. New York: Vantage Press.
  • Mongo Beti, Main basse sur le Cameroun. Autopsie d'une décolonisation (1972), new edition La Découverte, Paris 2003 [A classical critique of neo-colonialism. Raymond Marcellin, the French Minister of the Interior at the time, tried to prohibit the book. It could only be published after fierce legal battles.]
  • Frédéric Turpin. De Gaulle, Pompidou et l'Afrique (1958–1974): décoloniser et coopérer (Les Indes savantes, Paris, 2010. [Grounded on Foccart's previously inaccessibles archives]
  • Kum-Kum Bhavnani. (ed., et al.) Feminist futures: Re-imagining women, culture and development (Zed Books, NY, 2003). See: Ming-yan Lai's "Of Rural Mothers, Urban Whores and Working Daughters: Women and the Critique of Neocolonial Development in Taiwan's Nativist Literature", pp. 209–225.
  • David Birmingham. The decolonisation of Africa (Ohio University Press, 1995).
  • Charles Cantalupo(ed.). The world of Ngugi wa Thiong'o (Africa World Press, 1995).
  • Laura Chrisman and Benita Parry (ed.) Postcolonial theory and criticism (English Association, Cambridge, 2000).
  • Renato Constantino. Neocolonial identity and counter-consciousness: Essays on cultural decolonisation (Merlin Press, London, 1978).
  • George A. W. Conway. A responsible complicity: Neo/colonial power-knowledge and the work of Foucault, Said, Spivak (University of Western Ontario Press, 1996).
  • Julia V. Emberley. Thresholds of difference: feminist critique, native women's writings, postcolonial theory (University of Toronto Press, 1993).
  • Nikolai Aleksandrovich Ermolov. Trojan horse of neo-colonialism: U.S. policy of training specialists for developing countries (Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1966).
  • Thomas Gladwin. Slaves of the white myth: The psychology of neo-colonialism (Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ, 1980).
  • Lewis Gordon. Her Majesty's Other Children: Sketches of Racism from a Neocolonial Age (Rowman & Littlefield, 1997).
  • Ankie M. M. Hoogvelt. Globalisation and the postcolonial world: The new political economy of development (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001).
  • J. M. Hobson, The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
  • M. B. Hooker. Legal pluralism; an introduction to colonial and neo-colonial laws (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975).
  • E.M. Kramer (ed.) The emerging monoculture: assimilation and the "model minority" (Praeger, Westport, Conn., 2003). See: Archana J. Bhatt's "Asian Indians and the Model Minority Narrative: A Neocolonial System", pp. 203–221.
  • Geir Lundestad (ed.) The fall of great powers: Peace, stability, and legitimacy (Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, 1994).
  • Jean-Paul Sartre. 'Colonialism and neo-colonialism. Translated by Steve Brewer, Azzedine Haddour, Terry McWilliams Republished in the 2001 edition by Routledge France. ISBN 0-415-19145-9.
  • Peccia, T., 2014, "The Theory of the Globe Scrambled by Social Networks: A New Sphere of Influence 2.0", Jura Gentium – Rivista di Filosofia del Diritto Internazionale e della Politica Globale, Sezione "L'Afghanistan Contemporaneo", The Theory of the Globe Scrambled by Social Networks
  • Stuart J. Seborer. U.S. neo-colonialism in Africa (International Publishers, NY, 1974).
  • D. Simon. Cities, capital and development: African cities in the world economy (Halstead, NY, 1992).
  • Phillip Singer(ed.) Traditional healing, new science or new colonialism": (essays in critique of medical anthropology) (Conch Magazine, Owerri, 1977).
  • Jean Suret-Canale. Essays on African history: From the slave trade to neo-colonialism (Hurst, London 1988).
  • Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o. Barrel of a pen: Resistance to repression in neo-colonial Kenya (Africa Research & Publications Project, 1983).
  • Carlos Alzugaray Treto. El ocaso de un régimen neocolonial: Estados Unidos y la dictadura de Batista durante 1958,(The twilight of a neocolonial regime: The United States and Batista during 1958), in Temas: Cultura, Ideología y Sociedad, No.16-17, October 1998/March 1999, pp. 29–41 (La Habana: Ministry of Culture).
  • Uzoigw, Godfrey N. "Neocolonialism Is Dead: Long Live Neocolonialism." Journal of Global South Studies 36.1 (2019): 59–87.
  • Reports of International Arbitral Awards. Vol. XXVII. United Nations Publication. 2007. p. 188. ISBN 978-92-1-033098-5.
  • Richard Werbner (ed.) Postcolonial identities in Africa (Zed Books, NJ, 1996).
edit

Academic course materials

edit