"Military grade" (alternatively "military-grade" or "mil-spec") is a buzzword commonly used in marketing and advertising for consumer goods. It is generally used to describe an item or product that satisfies a United States Military Standard,[1][2] usually MIL-STD-810 for stress testing;[3] however, it is often used as a marketing ploy to describe a product that satisfies any military standard regardless of what it is (if a standard is satisfied at all to begin with), or one that simply uses materials that are also used in military technology ranging from Kevlar to aluminum.[4][5][6]
.jpg)
In marketing, "military grade" is meant to symbolize and evoke higher-than-usual levels of toughness, durability, efficiency, and quality, as well as the implication that the product was tested and "approved" by some (non-existent) overseeing body or is regularly used and trusted by militaries—even if none of those are true.[1][2][4] Products often marketed as "military grade" include phone cases, flashlights, electronics, eyewear, and clothing.[1][2]
Use of the term in marketing has been criticized by actual military personnel and veterans, who note that items that are indeed "military grade"—as in actually issued by militaries to their personnel—are often procured for cost-effectiveness and may not always be of the highest quality and reliability.[1][4][5][6] However, a product's use of the term should not be inferred as a sign it is unreliable, as some items using the term may in fact be using it genuinely (e.g. are in fact used by the military, or are identical to military equivalents).[1][2]
Notable uses
edit- In 2015, advertisements for the thirteenth generation Ford F-Series pickup truck notably described it as using "high strength, military-grade aluminum alloy", despite no such thing actually existing. The only real similarities between the aluminum used in the F-Series and some military vehicles are their composition and heat-treating.[4][5][7][8]
- In 2023, a dispute arose between Leonardo Helicopters and Lockheed Martin relating to marketing terminology used in the British Ministry of Defence's New Medium Helicopter program.[9] Lockheed had claimed other competitors in the program, including the AgustaWestland AW149 built by Leonardo, were not designed or suitable for military use (i.e. military grade), whereas their Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk was.[10]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b c d e Hollings, Alex (2021-06-27). "'Military grade' doesn't mean what you think it means". We Are The Mighty. Retrieved 2023-10-08.
- ^ a b c d Bledsoe, Everett (2023-10-01). "What Does Military Grade Mean? Find All the Answers Here". The Soldiers Project. Retrieved 2023-10-08.
- ^ "What is Military Grade? | Gateway Cable Company". Gateway Cable. Retrieved 2023-10-08.
- ^ a b c d "'Military Grade' Is Nothing but Marketing Bullshit". MEL Magazine. 2020-05-18. Retrieved 2023-10-08.
- ^ a b c Schogol, Jeff (2022-05-04). "Why 'military grade' is just another way of saying 'cheaply made junk'". Task & Purpose. Retrieved 2023-10-08.
- ^ a b Sheth, Sarang (2023-02-09). "Terms like 'military-grade' and 'aircraft-grade' are NOT indicators of good quality. Here's why - Yanko Design". Yanko Design. Retrieved 2023-10-08.
- ^ McIntosh, Jil (2018-09-25). "What's in a Name? Truth vs Marketing". AutoTrader.ca. Retrieved 2023-10-09.
- ^ White, Addison (2019-12-22). "Is Ford's Aluminum Really 'Military Grade'?". MotorBiscuit. Retrieved 2023-10-08.
- ^ Sprenger, Sebastian; Kington, Tom (2023-09-13). "In British helicopter race, war of words emerges over 'military grade'". Defense News. Retrieved 2023-10-08.
- ^ Sprenger, Sebastian; Chuter, Andrew (2023-09-12). "Lockheed touts local links in Black Hawk-based helicopter pitch to UK". Defense News. Retrieved 2023-10-08.