Projective harmonic conjugate

In projective geometry, the harmonic conjugate point of a point on the real projective line with respect to two other points is defined by the following construction:

$D$ is the harmonic conjugate of $C$ with respect to $A$ and $B$ .
$A, D, B, C$ form a harmonic range.
$KLMN$ is a complete quadrangle generating it.

Given three collinear points

A, B, C

, let

L

be a point not lying on their join and let any line through

C

meet

LA, LB

at

M, N

respectively. If

AN

and

BM

meet at

K

, and

LK

meets

AB

at

D

, then

D

is called the harmonic conjugate of

C

with respect to

A

and

B

.^[1]

The point $D$ does not depend on what point $L$ is taken initially, nor upon what line through $C$ is used to find $M$ and $N$ . This fact follows from Desargues theorem.

In real projective geometry, harmonic conjugacy can also be defined in terms of the cross-ratio as $(A, B; C, D) = -1$ .

Cross-ratio criterion

The four points are sometimes called a harmonic range (on the real projective line) as it is found that $D$ always divides the segment $AB$ internally in the same proportion as $C$ divides $AB$ externally. That is:

${\overline {AC}}:{\overline {BC}}={\overline {AD}}:{\overline {DB}}\,.$

If these segments are now endowed with the ordinary metric interpretation of real numbers they will be signed and form a double proportion known as the cross ratio (sometimes double ratio)

(A,B;C,D)={\frac {\overline {AC}}{\overline {AD}}}\left/{\frac {\overline {BC}}{-{\overline {DB}}}}\right.,

for which a harmonic range is characterized by a value of −1. We therefore write:

(A,B;C,D)={\frac {\overline {AC}}{\overline {AD}}}\times {\frac {\overline {BD}}{\overline {BC}}}=-1.

The value of a cross ratio in general is not unique, as it depends on the order of selection of segments (and there are six such selections possible). But for a harmonic range in particular there are just three values of cross ratio: ${-1, 1/2, 2},$ since −1 is self-inverse – so exchanging the last two points merely reciprocates each of these values but produces no new value, and is known classically as the harmonic cross-ratio.

In terms of a double ratio, given points $a, b$ on an affine line, the division ratio^[2] of a point $x$ is $t(x)={\frac {x-a}{x-b}}.$ Note that when $a < x < b$ , then $t (x)$ is negative, and that it is positive outside of the interval. The cross-ratio $(c,d;a,b)={\tfrac {t(c)}{t(d)}}$ is a ratio of division ratios, or a double ratio. Setting the double ratio to minus one means that when $t (c) + t (d) = 0$ , then $c$ and $d$ are harmonic conjugates with respect to $a$ and $b$ . So the division ratio criterion is that they be additive inverses.

Harmonic division of a line segment is a special case of Apollonius' definition of the circle.

In some school studies the configuration of a harmonic range is called harmonic division.

Of midpoint

Midpoint and infinity are harmonic conjugates.

When $x$ is the midpoint of the segment from $a$ to $b$ , then $t(x)={\frac {x-a}{x-b}}=-1.$ By the cross-ratio criterion, the harmonic conjugate of $x$ will be $y$ when $t (y) = 1$ . But there is no finite solution for $y$ on the line through $a$ and $b$ . Nevertheless, $\lim _{y\to \infty }t(y)=1,$ thus motivating inclusion of a point at infinity in the projective line. This point at infinity serves as the harmonic conjugate of the midpoint $x$ .

From complete quadrangle

Another approach to the harmonic conjugate is through the concept of a complete quadrangle such as $KLMN$ in the above diagram. Based on four points, the complete quadrangle has pairs of opposite sides and diagonals. In the expression of harmonic conjugates by H. S. M. Coxeter, the diagonals are considered a pair of opposite sides:

D

is the harmonic conjugate of

C

with respect to

A

and

B

, which means that there is a quadrangle

IJKL

such that one pair of opposite sides intersect at

A

, and a second pair at

B

, while the third pair meet

AB

at

C

and

D

.^[3]

It was Karl von Staudt that first used the harmonic conjugate as the basis for projective geometry independent of metric considerations:

...Staudt succeeded in freeing projective geometry from elementary geometry. In his Geometrie der Lage, Staudt introduced a harmonic quadruple of elements independently of the concept of the cross ratio following a purely projective route, using a complete quadrangle or quadrilateral.^[4]

P 1 = A

,

P 2 = S

,

P 3 = B

,

P 4 = Q

,

D = M

(ignore green M).

To see the complete quadrangle applied to obtaining the midpoint, consider the following passage from J. W. Young:

If two arbitrary lines

AQ, AS

are drawn through

A

and lines

BS, BQ

are drawn through

B

parallel to

AQ, AS

respectively, the lines

AQ, SB

meet, by definition, in a point

R

at infinity, while

AS, QB

meet by definition in a point

P

at infinity. The complete quadrilateral

PQRS

then has two diagonal points at

A

and

B

, while the remaining pair of opposite sides pass through

M

and the point at infinity on

AB

. The point

M

is then by construction the harmonic conjugate of the point at infinity on

AB

with respect to

A

and

B

. On the other hand, that

M

is the midpoint of the segment

AB

follows from the familiar proposition that the diagonals of a parallelogram (

PQRS

) bisect each other.^[5]

Quaternary relations

Four ordered points on a projective range are called harmonic points when there is a tetrastigm in the plane such that the first and third are codots and the other two points are on the connectors of the third codot.^[6]

If $p$ is a point not on a straight with harmonic points, the joins of $p$ with the points are harmonic straights. Similarly, if the axis of a pencil of planes is skew to a straight with harmonic points, the planes on the points are harmonic planes.^[6]

A set of four in such a relation has been called a harmonic quadruple.^[7]

Projective conics

A conic in the projective plane is a curve $C$ that has the following property: If $P$ is a point not on $C$ , and if a variable line through $P$ meets $C$ at points $A$ and $B$ , then the variable harmonic conjugate of $P$ with respect to $A$ and $B$ traces out a line. The point $P$ is called the pole of that line of harmonic conjugates, and this line is called the polar line of $P$ with respect to the conic. See the article Pole and polar for more details.

Inversive geometry

In the case where the conic is a circle, on the extended diameters of the circle, harmonic conjugates with respect to the circle are inverses in a circle. This fact follows from one of Smogorzhevsky's theorems:^[8]

If circles

k

and

q

are mutually orthogonal, then a straight line passing through the center of

k

and intersecting

q

, does so at points symmetrical with respect to

k

.

That is, if the line is an extended diameter of $k$ , then the intersections with $q$ are harmonic conjugates.

Conics and Joachimthal's equation

Consider as the curve $C$ an ellipse given by the equation

{\frac {x^{2}}{a^{2}}}+{\frac {y^{2}}{b^{2}}}=1.

Let $P(x_{0},y_{0})$ be a point outside the ellipse and $L$ a straight line from $P$ which meets the ellipse at points $A$ and $B$ . Let $A$ have coordinates $(\xi ,\eta )$ . Next take a point $Q(x,y)$ on $L$ and inside the ellipse which is such that $A$ divides the line segment $PQ$ in the ratio $1$ to $\lambda$ , i.e.

PA={\sqrt {(x_{0}-\xi )^{2}+(y_{0}-\eta )^{2}}}=1,\;\;\;AQ={\sqrt {(x-\xi )^{2}+(y-\eta )^{2}}}=\lambda

.

Instad of solving these equations for $\xi$ and $\eta$ it is easier to verify by substitution that the following expressions are the solutions, i.e.

(\xi ,\eta )={\bigg (}{\frac {\lambda x+x_{0}}{\lambda +1}},{\frac {\lambda y+y_{0}}{\lambda +1}}{\bigg )}.

Since the point $A$ lies on the ellipse $C$ , one has

{\frac {1}{a^{2}}}{\bigg (}{\frac {\lambda x+x_{0}}{\lambda +1}}{\bigg )}^{2}+{\frac {1}{b^{2}}}{\bigg (}{\frac {\lambda y+y_{0}}{\lambda +1}}{\bigg )}^{2}=1,

or

\lambda ^{2}{\bigg (}{\frac {x^{2}}{a^{2}}}+{\frac {y^{2}}{b^{2}}}-1{\bigg )}+2\lambda {\bigg (}{\frac {xx_{0}}{a^{2}}}+{\frac {yy_{0}}{b^{2}}}-1{\bigg )}+{\bigg (}{\frac {x_{0}^{2}}{a^{2}}}+{\frac {y_{0}^{2}}{b^{2}}}-1{\bigg )}=0.

This equation - which is a quadratic in $\lambda$ - is called Joachimthal's equation. Its two roots $\lambda _{1},\lambda _{2}$ , determine the positions of $A$ and $B$ in relation to $P$ and $Q$ . Let us associate $\lambda _{1}$ with $A$ and $\lambda _{2}$ with $B$ . Then the various line segments are given by

QA={\frac {1}{\lambda _{1}+1}}(x-x_{0},y-y_{0}),\;\;PA={\frac {\lambda _{1}}{\lambda _{1}+1}}(x_{0}-x,y_{0}-y)

and

QB={\frac {1}{\lambda _{2}+1}}(x-x_{0},y-y_{0}),\;\;PB={\frac {\lambda _{2}}{\lambda _{2}+1}}(x_{0}-x,y_{0}-y).

It follows that

{\frac {PB}{PA}}{\frac {QA}{QB}}={\frac {\lambda _{2}}{\lambda _{1}}}.

When this expression is $-1$ , we have

{\frac {QA}{PA}}=-{\frac {QB}{PB}}.

Thus $A$ divides $PQ$ ``internally´´ in the same proportion as $B$ divides $PQ$ ``externally´´. The expression

{\frac {PB}{PA}}{\frac {QA}{QB}}

with value $-1$ (which makes it self-inverse) is known as the harmonic cross ratio. With $\lambda _{2}/\lambda _{1}=-1$ as above, one has $\lambda _{1}+\lambda _{2}=0$ and hence the coefficient of $\lambda$ in Joachimthal's equation vanishes, i.e.

{\frac {xx_{0}}{a^{2}}}+{\frac {yy_{0}}{b^{2}}}-1=0.

This is the equation of a straight line called the polar (line) of point (pole) $P(x_{0},y_{0})$ . One can show that this polar of $P$ is the chord of contact of the tangents to the ellipse from $P$ . If we put $P$ on the ellipse ( $\lambda _{1}=0,\lambda _{2}=0$ ) the equation is that of the tangent at $P$ . One can also sho that the directrix of the ellipse is the polar of the focus.

Galois tetrads

In Galois geometry over a Galois field $GF(q)$ a line has $q + 1$ points, where $\infty = (1,0)$ . In this line four points form a harmonic tetrad when two harmonically separate the others. The condition

(c,d;a,b)=-1,\ {\text{ equivalently }}\ \ 2(cd+ab)=(c+d)(a+b),

characterizes harmonic tetrads. Attention to these tetrads led Jean Dieudonné to his delineation of some accidental isomorphisms of the projective linear groups $PGL(2, q)$ for $q = 5, 7, 9$ .^[9]

If $q = 2 n$ , and given $A$ and $B$ , then the harmonic conjugate of $C$ is itself.^[10]

Iterated projective harmonic conjugates and the golden ratio

Let $P 0, P 1, P 2$ be three different points on the real projective line. Consider the infinite sequence of points $P n$ , where $P n$ is the harmonic conjugate of $P n -3$ with respect to $P n -1, P n -2$ for $n > 2$ . This sequence is convergent.^[11]

For a finite limit $P$ we have

\lim _{n\to \infty }{\frac {P_{n+1}P}{P_{n}P}}=\Phi -2=-\Phi ^{-2}=-{\frac {3-{\sqrt {5}}}{2}},

where $\Phi ={\tfrac {1}{2}}(1+{\sqrt {5}})$ is the golden ratio, i.e. $P_{n+1}P\approx -\Phi ^{-2}P_{n}P$ for large $n$ . For an infinite limit we have

\lim _{n\to \infty }{\frac {P_{n+2}P_{n+1}}{P_{n+1}P_{n}}}=-1-\Phi =-\Phi ^{2}.

For a proof consider the projective isomorphism

f(z)={\frac {az+b}{cz+d}}

with

f\left((-1)^{n}\Phi ^{2n}\right)=P_{n}.

References

^ R. L. Goodstein & E. J. F. Primrose (1953) Axiomatic Projective Geometry, University College Leicester (publisher). This text follows synthetic geometry. Harmonic construction on page 11
^ Dirk Struik (1953) Lectures on Analytic and Projective Geometry, page 7
^ H. S. M. Coxeter (1942) Non-Euclidean Geometry, page 29, University of Toronto Press
^ B.L. Laptev & B.A. Rozenfel'd (1996) Mathematics of the 19th Century: Geometry, page 41, Birkhäuser Verlag ISBN 3-7643-5048-2
^ John Wesley Young (1930) Projective Geometry, page 85, Mathematical Association of America, Chicago: Open Court Publishing
^ ^a ^b G. B. Halsted (1906) Synthetic Projective Geometry, pages 15 & 16
^ Luis Santaló (1966) Geometría proyectiva, page 166, Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires
^ A.S. Smogorzhevsky (1982) Lobachevskian Geometry, Mir Publishers, Moscow
^ Jean Dieudonné (1954) "Les Isomorphisms exceptionnals entre les groups classiques finis", Canadian Journal of Mathematics 6: 305 to 15 doi:10.4153/CJM-1954-029-0
^ Emil Artin (1957) Geometric Algebra, page 82 via Internet Archive
^ F. Leitenberger (2016) Iterated harmonic divisions and the golden ratio, Forum Geometricorum 16: 429–430

Juan Carlos Alverez (2000) Projective Geometry, see Chapter 2: The Real Projective Plane, section 3: Harmonic quadruples and von Staudt's theorem.
Robert Lachlan (1893) An Elementary Treatise on Modern Pure Geometry, link from Cornell University Historical Math Monographs.
Bertrand Russell (1903) Principles of Mathematics, page 384.
Russell, John Wellesley (1905). Pure Geometry. Clarendon Press.

[1] R. L. Goodstein & E. J. F. Primrose (1953) Axiomatic Projective Geometry, University College Leicester (publisher). This text follows synthetic geometry. Harmonic construction on page 11

[2] Dirk Struik (1953) Lectures on Analytic and Projective Geometry, page 7

[3] H. S. M. Coxeter (1942) Non-Euclidean Geometry, page 29, University of Toronto Press

[4] B.L. Laptev & B.A. Rozenfel'd (1996) Mathematics of the 19th Century: Geometry, page 41, Birkhäuser Verlag ISBN 3-7643-5048-2

[5] John Wesley Young (1930) Projective Geometry, page 85, Mathematical Association of America, Chicago: Open Court Publishing

[GBH-6] G. B. Halsted (1906) Synthetic Projective Geometry, pages 15 & 16

[7] Luis Santaló (1966) Geometría proyectiva, page 166, Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires

[8] A.S. Smogorzhevsky (1982) Lobachevskian Geometry, Mir Publishers, Moscow

[9] Jean Dieudonné (1954) "Les Isomorphisms exceptionnals entre les groups classiques finis", Canadian Journal of Mathematics 6: 305 to 15 doi:10.4153/CJM-1954-029-0

[10] Emil Artin (1957) Geometric Algebra, page 82 via Internet Archive

[11] F. Leitenberger (2016) Iterated harmonic divisions and the golden ratio, Forum Geometricorum 16: 429–430

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]