File talk:Waterboard3-small.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Badagnani in topic Deletion discussion
WikiProject iconVisual arts File‑class
WikiProject iconThis file is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
FileThis file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconCambodia NA‑class
WikiProject iconFile Waterboard3-small.jpg is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
NAThis file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]
WikiProject iconHuman rights File‑class
WikiProject iconThis file is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
FileThis file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography File‑class
WikiProject iconThis file is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
FileThis file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Comments

edit

I came to wikipedia to find answers regarding this highly contraversial technique. This authentic rendering by a waterboarding victim is necessary in depicting what an atrocity it really is. To remove the picture would be a sincere injustice to the people seeking information as well as the victims themselves.

Strong Keep Waterboard pic

edit

The original artist clearly intended this picture to be distributed as widely as possible. It is disturbing, but necessary to educate those of us, myself included, who had no idea what waterboarding was until I just happened upon this image. note: I am new here. If this is not the correct place for this comment, please feel free to educate me. Janewry (talk) 20:05, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion

edit

Why is the closed deletion discussion not linked here, as should have been done? Badagnani (talk) 19:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

The deletion discussion is still not linked properly. This oversight should be corrected. Badagnani (talk) 22:56, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use non-rationales

edit

I have removed the following from the fair use rationales presented on this page. They are either false, or not are remotely relevant to any possible fair use claim. ➪HiDrNick! 19:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

  1. it is a historically significant photo of an important event in human history.
  2. Its inclusion in the article adds significantly to the article because it shows the subject of this article and how the event depicted was very historically significant to the general public.
  3. the photo was taken in a public museum
  4. the photo has value for all human kind which is arguably greater than any copyright issue.
  5. proud moment in American history
I reverted you. Please stop. The proud moment nonsense was added by someone else, I didn't look where. The others are fine for information/consideration. Don't remove them again. Lawrence § t/e 19:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply