File talk:Raven Ridge, Colorado.jpg

Latest comment: 12 years ago by The Shoveller in topic K-T boundary?
WikiProject iconUnited States: Colorado File‑class
WikiProject iconThis file is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
FileThis file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This file is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to improve, create, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado.
To comment about this file, select the New section tab above.
For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

K-T boundary?

edit

As another user noted here, this isn't a good example of the K-T boundary, because it's represented here by an unconformity, ie the actual boundary is missing.

Note that the current NASA graphic has dropped the KT line on the photo: [1]. I'll upload the new version shortly. Unhelpfully, NASA doesn't note the correction. --Pete Tillman (talk) 02:29, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply


The dotted line on the Raven Ridge image is actually not far off the Wasatchian-Bridgerian boundary in the Eocene. There is an unconformity between underlying Mesa Verde Formation (Cretaceous) and the overlying Colton/Wasatch Formation (Early Eocene... Wasatchian), but it's further to the east and not visible in air photos. The Raven Ridge strata are of no significance at all with regards to the K-T boundary. The NASA photo has been updated, so hopefully this misinformation will stop proliferating. The Shoveller (talk) 04:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply