File talk:Notophthalmus viridescens edit.jpg

Following authors comments at the lend of the image's FPC nomination page and further discussion at the FPC talk page, here are three versions for comparison:

original submission

edit1, the successful Featured Picture now questioned by the author

edit2, as original with slightly cooler colour correction

I'm not at all sure my edit (the third one) is any more accurate than the original.. the CC shift is about the same as you'd expect with a warm Wratten 81C filter removed, if that makes any sense. The tree and old needles look more natural to me, but the author's thoughts in particular would obviously be welcome. --mikaul^talk 19:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Could someone format this better? I'm in a mad rush.. --mikaul^talk 19:32, 30 October 2007 (UTC)