Bad image
edit
Blurry, and apparently not from 2007 as the author alleges, see exif info. Should be replaced with something better. prokaryotes (talk) 12:07, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Of course it should be replaced with something better, but we don't have a better free image. As for the date, it is correct, and the camera data is wrong, as I took the photo of Romm the day before I uploaded the image. -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for explaining. I looked, there is one image at Flickr which would apply, but not really that good either. I wonder if we could use this https://www.americanprogress.org/about/staff/romm-joseph/bio/ they even provide a high res for download, under non-free limited to his page clause. What do you think?prokaryotes (talk) 14:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- The image at American Progress is a good image, but it does not apparently bear a license that Wikipedia accepts as free. -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, emailed them. prokaryotes (talk) 14:57, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- The image at American Progress is a good image, but it does not apparently bear a license that Wikipedia accepts as free. -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
