Isn't this image in error? The first binary octet pair has only fourteen bits. While I realize that this represents 2001 in binary, shouldn't the two zeroes lead it, as the :: at the end means that all of the colons in the binary are two places off, making the first octet pair 8004.Jon Thompson (talk) 03:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
It definitely threw me off. BobbyPeru (talk) 18:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
There should be two leading 0's in the binary form --91.65.242.143 (talk) 16:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
The 0's are still missing... 88.148.251.200 (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
