File talk:Boulevard du Temple.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Timrem in topic commons
WikiProject iconFrance File‑class
WikiProject iconThis file is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
FileThis file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I wonder, does this street or any of these building still stand? Does anyone know? ---G. 02:55, 11 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

The closest thing I could find here is Boulevard theatre. It would be interesting to retake this photo, 177years later — Jack · talk · 14:03, Friday, 27 April 2007

Are we not also seeing another person? The one shining the shoes? Lindarosewood 01:17, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

He was moving around more, so he just looks like a blob. --Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 02:21, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply


Does anyone know where this picture is currently located? Is it at the University of Texas at Austin? I know the first photo taken by Niépce is there, but I thought they had this one too.


“It is of a busy street, but because exposure time was over ten minutes, the city traffic was moving too much to appear.”

If there was traffic the photo would show a blur of the traffic not the details of the pavement. Deville hubbard 12:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

This came up in the FP discussion for this image. It was the photographer himself who said that the street was busy, and my guess is that there is a big difference between his and our use of the word "busy". Toady that means bumper-to-bumper cars, but in 1830 it probably only meant the occasional carriage. If one of them goes by every minute, than each part of the photo is spending around 57 seconds per minute looking at the street, which would be enough to show details of it. --Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 13:40, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

commons edit

why it is not copied to commons?<--Pejman47 16:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Umm, it is. timrem 05:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)Reply