Talk:LKAB Minerals
![]() | LKAB Minerals was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 16, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Removing Nofollow and Noindex Tags on LKAB Minerals Page
editI am seeking assistance with the LKAB Minerals page, which currently has nofollow and noindex tags. As the page creator, I aim to ensure it meets Wikipedia’s standards for quality and notability.
Request: Article Review: Could experienced editors review the page and suggest improvements?
Compliance Guidance: Please highlight any specific issues leading to the tags.
Tag Removal: Once addressed, could you assist in removing these tags to improve the page’s visibility?
I am dedicated to contributing valuable content and would appreciate your expertise.Thank you for your help.Bdatpal (talk) 09:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- What do you mean by nofollow? All external links on every Wikimedia page is tagged nofollow. Reconrabbit 18:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:LKAB Minerals/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Bdatpal (talk · contribs) 11:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Reconrabbit (talk · contribs) 18:24, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm going to review this article.
Prose
edit- There are statements that read like marketing-speak, such as
The primary goal was to find and develop new markets
anddiversified its operations
. There are more neutral ways to state what the company was established for. - The top lead paragraph does not summarize the article. It is too short and does not discuss products beyond iron ore.
- History is very sparse. There has to be more than just "it was established as Minelco AB in 1989".
References
edit- Reference list fits the manual of style.
- There is confusion in the sources used between LKAB (the state-owned mining company) and LKAB Minerals the subsidiary.
- No copyright violations found.
- Many references used are press releases or are published by LKAB Minerals themselves. They are not independent sources of the company and cannot reliably be used to source claims that are made here.
Images
edit- The image of the chalk plant is used appropriately, but the logo is not. It has to be uploaded to English Wikipedia and not Commons since it is not public domain.
Other notes
edit- Page seems stable and has no edit wars.
- There is just not much substance to this article. There are many things hinted at in the infobox, image caption, history that are not elucidated upon, such as the manufacture and processing of chalk, GGBS, huntite, or the identities of any of the people involved in the company. I have had to fail this Good Article nomination because it is in no way broad enough to encompass even some of the presumably available information about a company that has existed for 3 decades and is easily confused for its parent company. Reconrabbit 18:27, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|