| Submission declined on 26 January 2024 by Ldm1954 (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 5 November 2023 by WikiOriginal-9 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. | |
Comment: Just because this is a translation does not make it right for the English Wikipedia. This reads like a CV, not like a concise article. It should be about 1/3 the length, with only really major achievements not everything. Sections such as "Public activity" are pretty much irrelevant. Ldm1954 (talk) 15:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Not enough independent, significant coverage. Not enough citations on Google Scholar. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 07:20, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Sourcing and notability requirements are not the same for all language versions of Wikipedia. The article "re-creator" acknowledged paid editing, however is it known if public relations editing occurred in the Hebrew article? Graywalls (talk) 22:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: What is the source for the date of birth? See WP:BLP. All statements, starting with the date of birth, need to be sourced or removed. Greenman (talk) 22:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment:
To the reviewer: This article is a sentence-by-sentence translation from the Hebrew article, with added sources. It is about one of the known academic professors in Israel.
This article comply with the specific notability guideline for academics (WP:PROF): 1) Criterion 1 is to show that the academic has been an author of highly cited academic work - citations need to occur in peer-reviewed scholarly publications such as journals or academic books.
2) The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources
Thenks - Ovedc (talk) 06:37, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Simon L. Dolan | |
|---|---|
| שמעון לנדאו דולן | |
| Born | 20 October 1947 (age 76) |
| Citizenship | Israel |
| Education | University of Minnesota |
| Known for | Organizational psychology and Human resource management |
| Website | https://www.simondolan.com |